[ALUG] Dealing with spam, was Re: [OT?] Finding a spamming virus

[MJ Ray]

Brett Parker <iDunno at sommitrealweird.co.uk> wrote:
> As I understand it, from what I read, this is nothing more or less than
> Yet Another implementation of DKIM[0].

Aren't Yahoo still claiming they have software patents on DomainKeys
and threatening to drag any users to Californian courts?

> Why not just use GPG extensively, make everyone sign their mail, and
> only accept mail that has a trust path to your key... that's almost as
> sane (and very obviously flawed).

I thought we were discussing GPG here, but I see it wasn't explicit.

Regards,
-- 
MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small
worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
(Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237