From laurie@brownowl.com Tue Apr 1 17:05:09 2003 From: Laurie Brown To: main@lists.alug.org.uk Subject: Re: [Alug] Re: [linux-users] Busting the Spam Buster ... Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 17:06:01 +0000 Message-ID: <3E89B909.5070605@brownowl.com> In-Reply-To: <3E89AD7F.5050507@magenta-netlogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6443158336273106960==" --===============6443158336273106960== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tony Hoyle wrote: > (Ted Harding) wrote: >=20 >> Got yet another of those performance-enhancer spams. >> The HTML has been confusingly fragmented (see below) >> no doubt to evade filters which search for keywords ... >> >> >> >
>> SIZE AND STAMINA >> DO MATTER
>=20 >=20 > SA makes short work of it, though... >=20 > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D3.4 tagged_above=3D-10000.0 required=3D5.0 > tests=3DHTML_30_40, PENIS_ENLARGE2, UPPERCASE_25_50 >=20 > Anything like an open relay or forged header would have pushed it over=20 > the edge into spam oblivion. I'm running SA with amavisd, the latest versions, and I must say, it seems a = lot less effective than it was, and a lot less flexible... Maybe I need to=20 spend more time customising, but I'm getting a lot of spam breaking through, = and can't find a way to create user-specific white/black-lists/filters any mo= re. I came back from the rugby this weekend to over 500 detected spams... Cheers, Laurie. --=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Laurie Brown laurie(a)brownowl.com -------------------------------------------------------------------- --===============6443158336273106960==--