26 Nov
2005
26 Nov
'05
5:40 p.m.
Jon Dye wrote:
If you'd said Java I'd have understood the argument as in Java everything has to be part of an object.
I thought Java was another of these silly languages like Python where not everything is an object, but "everything is an object" is still often claimed?
I guess "everything is an object except the things that aren't" doesn't make teachers and advocates look as good...
--
MJR/slef, personal email, http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html