I have a Windows XP box and a Ubuntu 8.10 box plugged in to the same router. FWIW, it's a BT HomeHub 2 that I'm currently trialling.

Both work, although for some reason the Ubuntu box has an odd tracert:

$ sudo tracert 216.239.59.147
traceroute to 216.239.59.147 (216.239.59.147), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  BThomehub.home (192.168.1.254)  55.623 ms  55.417 ms  55.174 ms
 2  217.47.200.58 (217.47.200.58)  33.711 ms * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *
 5  * * *
 6  * 217.41.170.65 (217.41.170.65)  41.333 ms *
 7  * 217.41.170.122 (217.41.170.122)  31.084 ms  33.988 ms
 8  * * *
 9  * * *
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  * * 195.99.125.82 (195.99.125.82)  33.735 ms
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  gv-in-f147.google.com (216.239.59.147)  45.999 ms * *

Compare that with the Windows box;
C:\>tracert www.google.com

Tracing route to www.l.google.com [216.239.59.147]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    43 ms   100 ms    99 ms  BThomehub.home [192.168.1.254]
  2   476 ms   395 ms   435 ms  217.47.200.58
  3   179 ms   184 ms   187 ms  217.47.250.161
  4   191 ms    32 ms    62 ms  217.47.200.10
  5    63 ms    63 ms   153 ms  217.41.170.21
  6    82 ms    62 ms    97 ms  217.41.170.65
  7   234 ms   215 ms   122 ms  217.41.170.122
  8   206 ms   183 ms   183 ms  217.41.170.50
  9   230 ms   244 ms   245 ms  217.47.200.241
 10   470 ms   320 ms   307 ms  core1-pos0-0-0-5.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [194.72.20.113]
 11   370 ms   367 ms   369 ms  core1-pos14-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [195.99.125.225]
 12   423 ms   490 ms   453 ms  195.99.125.82
 13   422 ms   423 ms   409 ms  209.85.255.175
 14    45 ms    67 ms    93 ms  209.85.250.216
 15   101 ms   151 ms   123 ms  66.249.95.164
 16   203 ms   184 ms   185 ms  216.239.49.114
 17   249 ms   249 ms   242 ms  gv-in-f147.google.com [216.239.59.147]

Trace complete.

It seems to me that the Linux box is losing lots of packets. Many get through, but many do not. Or am I just worrying about nothing, given that it seems to work OK. On the bright side, those packets that do get through do so a lot quicker than those on Windows, but that may be just because my Linux box is less archaic.

Any ideas?

Thanks,

Greg