I'd second you on that one Laurie.
I started using Redhat since the dawn of time, but SuSE became much more stable so I switched over to it instead. I do have Redhat and Mandrake systems, but for *real* production SuSE is always the way!
Andi
Laurie Brown laurie@brownowl.com@stu.uea.ac.uk on 21/08/2001 11:25:00
Sent by: alug-admin@stu.uea.ac.uk
To: alug@stu.uea.ac.uk cc:
Subject: Re: [Alug] Lurkers (was new subscriber introductions)
21/08/01 11:00:56, Adam Bower abower@thebowery.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, D.I. Redhouse wrote:
Didn't it go through a period of being quite badly behind most of the other distributions?
More like other distros try and race each other into having the most unstable software with the biggest version number in! One of the
That's one reason I'm still with SuSE after all this time. They haven't messed me about at all, and if beta software is in the distro, they ensure one is aware of it. IMO, for a newbie, SuSE can't be beaten. Every time I've been near RH, OTOH...
Cheers, Laurie. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Laurie Brown laurie@brownowl.com PGP key at http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ alug, the Anglian Linux User Group list Send list replies to alug@stu.uea.ac.uk http://www.anglian.lug.org.uk/ http://rabbit.stu.uea.ac.uk/cgi-bin/listinfo/alug See the website for instructions on digest or unsub!