** MJ Ray markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk [2003-05-28 23:18]:
Paul Tansom paul@aptanet.com wrote:
Oh, fnuts, done it again. Thanks Keith. I think this and the Linux1394 list must the the only two lists that don't set the reply to be the list
- they're certainly the only ones I make this mistake on.
For the nth time, if you really can't cope with a mailing list that behaves itself, your choices are:-
Second for me I think, but that's not an issue. Sorry if it seemed like a complaint, I'm a little flat out at the moment and possible becoming a bit short in my tone. This appears to be one of ony two lists I'm on that use this particular setup, so if I've not posted for a while I tend to forget - sorry.
- Use a filter to add a reply-to header to incoming email with our
List-Id header;
Interesting thought.
- Use a better mail client, one that recognises RFC-2919 headers (next
release of GNUMail will, for you GUI users);
I use Mutt, not aware that it was considered a poort client, and it's certainly not GUI ;-) What I do need to do though is sort out configuring lists in the muttrc file.
- Learn to "reply to all" when you want to "reply to all".
As I said, merely me forgetting that I need to on this list. Apologies again. As an a thought, the Debian lists must use the same setup, surely. It's a while since I posted to one though.
Can the FAQ maintainer (Adam?) please patch this one into it? Ta.
** end quote [MJ Ray]