On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:42:15AM +0000, IanBell wrote:
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 8:55 am, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2003-11-26 23:23:48 +0000 Keith Watson kpwatson@ukfsn.org wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:29:44 +0000
IanBell ian@redtommo.com wrote:
Or in the true recursive GNU tradition: ALUG's a Linux User Group
Actually, that's not bad.
Still has the two parts I don't really like: one program and nothing else; "User Group". Why not (stealing shamelessly): ALUG's a Libre Unix Group?
Top notch bit of Franglais there. Should that not be:
ALUG c'est Group Unix Libre ?
Trouble is that changes the Alug etla to Agul :)
Anyhow I like either Alug's a Linux user group or Alug's a libre unix group although I still don't see what is wrong with the current name :)
I was going to write something here about corporate rebranding, but then forgot what i was going to write, you will have to imagine it :)
Adam