On Thu, 28 May 2009 15:41:56 +0100 Adam Bower adam@thebowery.co.uk allegedly wrote:
This is a feature not a bug with the Alug mailing list. I think the canonical answer is : http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
There are arguments both ways:
http://www.blackgate.net/consulting/reply-to_munging_useful.html
and
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful/
And to answer the original point, it varies by client. My preferred client (claws) does the following:
"Reply" - reply to list "All" - reply to list, cc sender "Sender" - reply to sender
Mick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The text file for RFC 854 contains exactly 854 lines. Do you think there is any cosmic significance in this?
Douglas E Comer - Internetworking with TCP/IP Volume 1
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc854.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------