Jonathan McDowell noodles@earth.li writes:
I'm still confused as to how anyone's managed to pick up the blackcatnetworks address; AFAICT it doesn't appear in the headers anywhere,
Not in this case, no, but it does sometimes:
Received: from nemesis.systems.pipex.net ([62.190.223.8]) by terry.blackcatnetworks.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Rsmd-0003VI-00 for main@lists.blackcatnetworks.co.uk; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 12:03:51 +0100 Received: from cloaked.freeserve.co.uk (81-86-163-141.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.163.141]) by nemesis.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3641600048D for main@lists.alug.org.uk; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:03:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: slrnailgsf.873.markj+0111@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk
it's not used in the sender envelope and it's not publicised anywhere. I'm obviously wrong about one of these though, either that or Outlook is even more brain damaged that I can possibly comprehend.
Douglas was using "Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6)" so it's not clear that Outlook has anything to do with it.