Send main mailing list submissions to
main@lists.alug.org.uk
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
main-request@lists.alug.org.uk
You can reach the person managing the list at
main-owner@lists.alug.org.uk
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of main digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Just signed up (mick)
2. Re: Just signed up (Steve Engledow)
3. Re: (no subject) (Wayne Stallwood)
4. (no subject) (RICHARD FLETCHER)
5. Re: (no subject) ( (Ted Harding))
6. Re: (no subject) (mick)
7. Re: there are two binaries, one works one does not
(Peter Alcibiades)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:32:38 +0100
From: mick <mbm@rlogin.net>
To: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ALUG] Just signed up
Message-ID: <20130421123238.79e6a425@gate.rlogin.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:58:09 +0100
Brett Parker <iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk> allegedly wrote:
> On 19 Apr 15:43, Ewan Slater wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just joined the list and I was wondering if and when there are
> > any face - to - face meetings of the group, and/or key - signing
> > sessions?
>
> The usual monthly meetings are as per the website:
> http://www.alug.org.uk/
>
> Basically, 2nd Thursday in Norwich and 3rd Monday in Ipswich.
>
> If there's any other time/place you want to meet it's worth throwing
> out to the list to see if there's any interest.
Hi Ewan and welcome.
As far as key signing goes, you can probably do that at a pub meeting.
Mick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
blog: baldric.net
gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alug.org.uk/pipermail/main/attachments/20130421/7042e4fc/attachment-0001.pgp>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 14:02:29 +0100
From: Steve Engledow <steve@offend.me.uk>
To: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ALUG] Just signed up
Message-ID: <20130421130229.GA31413@offend.members.linode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
----- Forwarded message from mick <mbm@rlogin.net> -----
Hi Ewan and welcome.
As far as key signing goes, you can probably do that at a pub meeting.
Mick
----- End forwarded message -----
Welcome to ALUG, Ewan.
As Mick said, key signing does indeed happen occasionally at pubmeets so come down to one some time. We're generally very unorganised though and have to go look up how to do key signing every time :)
We're all experts, honest.
It's also worth getting onto IRC at some point to say hi. We're on irc.alug.org.uk in the #alug channel.
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alug.org.uk/pipermail/main/attachments/20130421/575eca87/attachment-0001.pgp>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:27:44 +0100
From: Wayne Stallwood <ALUGlist@digimatic.co.uk>
To: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ALUG] (no subject)
Message-ID: <51742190.5070106@digimatic.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 21/04/13 09:58, (Ted Harding) wrote:
>
> Spam is unusual on this list! Poking through the archives for
> Richard Fletcher ("roofletch at yahoo.com") with search term "fletch"
> there is a similar posting from this address on
> Fri Sep 14 16:30:16 BST 2012
> (with a link to http://nastrani.ic.cz/urworkcap.php?mopage=f9y9 )
>
Joined in '03 and last (non spam post) I can see was end of '04.
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 12:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: RICHARD FLETCHER <roofletch@yahoo.com>
To: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: [ALUG] (no subject)
Message-ID:
<1366571539.73592.BPMail_high_noncarrier@web141001.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
http://www.blochtech.com/components/com_content/serviceg/noise/apologize
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:55:49 +0100 (BST)
From: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding@wlandres.net>
To: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ALUG] (no subject)
Message-ID: <XFMail.20130421205549.Ted.Harding@wlandres.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On 21-Apr-2013 19:12:19 RICHARD FLETCHER wrote:
>
> http://www.blochtech.com/components/com_content/serviceg/noise/apologize
>
> _______________________________________________
> main@lists.alug.org.uk
> http://www.alug.org.uk/
> http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main
> Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above!
And again! Probably not Richard's fault -- see the message
about a very similar problem on the Evidence-Based Health
list about 6 weeks ago:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/
webadmin?A2=EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH;1f56f134.1303
[all one line; also = http://tinyurl.com/d4dkxz3 ]
It would seem that this Yahoo exploit somehow steals subscribed
user-IDs and circumvents spam filters in order to get this spam
into email lists via underground tunnels. In such circumstances
the alleged "sender" cannot be at fault -- it could happen to
any of us!
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
-------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding@wlandres.net>
Date: 21-Apr-2013 Time: 20:55:43
This message was sent by XFMail
-------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:21:24 +0100
From: mick <mbm@rlogin.net>
To: Ted.Harding@wlandres.net
Cc: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ALUG] (no subject)
Message-ID: <20130421212124.71f9352c@gate.rlogin.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:55:49 +0100 (BST)
(Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding@wlandres.net> allegedly wrote:
>
> It would seem that this Yahoo exploit somehow steals subscribed
> user-IDs and circumvents spam filters in order to get this spam
> into email lists via underground tunnels. In such circumstances
> the alleged "sender" cannot be at fault -- it could happen to
> any of us!
Not me. I'm invulnerable. I never click on links in email....
Oh. Damn.......
:-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
blog: baldric.net
gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alug.org.uk/pipermail/main/attachments/20130421/11ed3573/attachment-0001.pgp>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:10:14 +0100
From: Peter Alcibiades <palcibiades-first@yahoo.co.uk>
To: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ALUG] there are two binaries, one works one does not
Message-ID: <201304220710.14790.palcibiades-first@yahoo.co.uk>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Wonderful! Thanks a million, it worked.
I think the one in the home directory must have been the one I compiled it to. Anyway, I put the Qt5 files into /opt, edited the the etc file to add an entry with the libraries location, ran ldconfig as instructed, and now everything works. I'd never have figured that one out for myself. Cheers!
Al
On Sunday 21 April 2013 11:08:44 Srdjan Todorovic wrote:
> Please reply to your email and do not start a new thread for the same problem.
>
> On 21 April 2013 10:19, Peter Alcibiades <palcibiades-first@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > The binary that works is in the home directory.
>
> Why do you have this? Is this the directory where you compiled Sigil
> before installing it? Maybe it has temporary libQt5 libraries needed
> for compiling, not running but if the current folder is used for
> library path, then it would pick up the qt5 libraries.
> And only if you ran Sigil from that folder.
>
> > The one that does not is in usr/local/bin.
>
> Try the ldconfig tip in my original email.
>
> Regards,
> Srdjan
>
>
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
main@lists.alug.org.uk
http://www.anglian.lug.org.uk/
http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main
End of main Digest, Vol 94, Issue 19
************************************