Just to add to this, the archiving software included with Mailman does
not archive any attachments. If anybody is looking for these particular
files on the archive, they will need to contact the original author
anyway.
--
Email : martyn@drake.org.uk
Web :
http://www.drake.org.uk
Web :
http://www.martyn-drake.info
-----Original Message-----
From: main-admin@lists.alug.org.uk [mailto:main-admin@lists.alug.org.uk]
On Behalf Of xsprite@bigfoot.com
Sent: 02 December 2001 17:46
To: MJ Ray
Cc: main@lists.alug.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Alug] 500Bytes - 40 Gig
on Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 03:29:18PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Long config files I'd rather see placed in webspace somewhere than
sent to
> the list, but I don't think that's been discussed here yet.
Attachments
> have.
ok, I didn't see uuencoding some content as attaching it (attaching
usually
refers to mime these days..). Pasting some config files are still
attachments
by this definition though.
I agree unnecessary attachments are bad. But if someone specifically
asks for the contents of a file or it are necessarily to demonstrate
something, I personally would far prefer to have that posted to the
list.
Someone (I apologise to that person) decided recently not to post
command
output to the list for fear it would annoy you.
Something in the faq/mailing list welcome/reminder, like this might help
clear things up: "You should avoid attaching files of any kind, this
includes
MIME/Base64/uuencoded files. It is quite acceptable to post a short
extract
from any relevant configuration file or command output. For long
contents and
additional files, place them on an ftp or http site and post the url.
Signatures should not exceed 4 lines. Avoid webmail systems that
automagically
attach advertising signatures."
> You're assuming that every person will want it. I doubt that 10% of
the
> 150+ subscribers to this list wanted that zip file (only one person
> requested it, so sending it offlist as an attachment would probably
have
> sufficed), so I'm not sure how that would change your figures.
well, the list isn't just accessible by ~150 people. Posts to the list
outlast subscriptions, and yes, I've got this "but what if in
$timeperiod
someone has the same problem, and we already have a good archive of
answers"
in my head lots. Information (including addition files) need to be
easily accessible to them. I have suffered too much from dead links in
archives in the past.
above!