12 Jul
2001
12 Jul
'01
9:03 a.m.
On Wed, 11 Jul, 2001 at 23:36 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Sorry all for being off-message here. I thought the OP said that it wasn't just a straight replication problem.
True. In the original post, the databases weren't identical, so it's possible that "traditional" replication techniques would not work. But then, I find myself asking "why aren't the databases the same?" and "isn't it dangerous to try two non-identical databases?". I'd be inclined to pull the identical tables into a separate, replicateable database.
Andrew.
--
All views are my own, who else would want them?