Looks fine, if a little devious. 127.0.0.2 is a perfectly valid LB address, so I can't see why you shouldn't. Only slightly odd thing is that in theory you should probably ifconfig up an lo:0 alias for 0.0.2, but it seems to work without.
Paul
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 03:55:29PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
Any apache gurus on the list,
I've been doing some site development, and rather than have to tweak all the addresses, I added 127.0.0.2 sitename to the /etc/hosts file and defined 127.0.0.2 as a virtual host. I don't know why, but I feel that's a bad thing to do: is it?
MJR
[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]
[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]