On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:54:53AM +0100, Srdjan Todorovic wrote:
Hi,
2009/4/8 Brett Parker iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk:
On 08 Apr 09:52, Chris G wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:13:49AM +0100, James Freer wrote:
http://blog.canonical.com/?p=110
Thought some may be interested in this report. Seems ubuntu is doing very well.
How many use it in this group?
I use it on my garage backup system.
I didn't know that Ubuntu server came in a tarmac flavour (I'm assuming that the driveway/road is the backup to the garage)
Hah! I'm wondering if I should add "Ubuntu Server" to my list of oxymorons.
Joking aside, what is Ubuntu Server all about anyway? Surely it's just Ubuntu without a GUI, and at that rate, won't it just be better/easier/cooler/nicer/smarter/$adjective to just run Debian?
If you're running Ubuntu on other systems then having it on servers too makes for less difference.