On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:23:27PM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 11:44:39AM +0100, samwise wrote:
On 19/10/2007, Steve <steve@iffirewouldfall.com> wrote:
Therefore, my answer stands because imho, "there can be only one" and it's XHTML.
</nazi>
Steve
Shame, I thought that we'd given up on that. Isn't the rest of the WWW's future going to be based on HTML 5?
Nah - it's going to go back to being plain text, readable and accessable...
... unless you're accessing an UTF-16 plain text using the wrong editor ... ;-) Best regards, Jan -- +- Jan T. Kim -------------------------------------------------------+ | email: jtk@cmp.uea.ac.uk | | WWW: http://www.cmp.uea.ac.uk/people/jtk | *-----=< hierarchical systems are for files, not for humans >=-----*