17 Nov
2002
17 Nov
'02
2:36 p.m.
on Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:04:43PM +0000, Adam Bower wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:02:34PM +0000, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
(And again: I set mail-followup-to for a reason.)
Interestingly I can't find any RFC that actually requires mail-followup-to to be implemented, does anybody know of such an RFC?
There was an ietf draft but I think that expired. It seems to be a djb invention. http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html rfc2822 (822bis) does not require it. rfc2822 was published in April 2001; Mail-Followup-To: existed before that.