On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 06:32:45PM +0000, samwise wrote:
How so? You called me out for suggesting dd-wrt might serve a certain class of user better than openwrt. If you don't think openwrt fits all, what were you drawing attention to?
Err no, you said a few things about DD-WRT, and I quote:
"The X-wrt GUI interface is really not in the same league as DD-WRT yet, unfortunately. Probably won't be, until a while after Kamikaze stablises."
My experience with DD-WRT was the opposite, therefore your statement isn't always true.
"There's a lot of FUD around DD-WRT, I think - IMHO, it's a better bet for those who want to be able to customise a lot, without resorting to telnet."
I found it hard to customise and tbh a pain in the arse to use, hence why I went to openwrt as I wanted something that works, rather than something which didn't work, had a dubious license and a hostile user base. You are the one who jumped in suggesting it as the "better" option, and it seems you are the one forgetting the "rainbow" of users.
Adam