Can we clear something up is it ALUG 6 or ALUG 28?
If ALUG 28 where were the other 23 meetings?
Justin Jonas
[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Justin Jonas wrote:
Can we clear something up is it ALUG 6 or ALUG 28?
Yes!
If ALUG 28 where were the other 23 meetings?
IIRC, Adam kindly volunteered to host one of the later ALUGs in North Norfolk - he said around ALUG28 or so. Since we didn't have any other venues that we hadn't already visited many times, we decided to hold ALUG28 after ALUG5.
I suspect ALUG6 will be after ALUG28. Almost as confusing as Sun's OS numbers...
Andrew.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.Savory at uea.ac.uk All views are my own - who else would want them? -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]
Ah, thank you!
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Andrew Savory wrote:
IIRC, Adam kindly volunteered to host one of the later ALUGs in North Norfolk - he said around ALUG28 or so. Since we didn't have any other venues that we hadn't already visited many times, we decided to hold ALUG28 after ALUG5.
I suspect ALUG6 will be after ALUG28. Almost as confusing as Sun's OS numbers...
Probably on par with Newbie confusion on why there is RedHat 6.2 yet Linux 2.2.
James. - public beta of LNC coming Wednesday (sshhhhh!)
[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]
On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Green J M K wrote:
Probably on par with Newbie confusion on why there is RedHat 6.2 yet Linux 2.2.
And why Patrick decided to leap from Slackware 3.x to 7.0 directly, since everyone said "hey, why are you four major versions behind RedHat?" :-)
Aq.
On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Aquarius wrote:
And why Patrick decided to leap from Slackware 3.x to 7.0 directly, since everyone said "hey, why are you four major versions behind RedHat?" :-)
In defence, Slackware 4 was most definitely a real release, 5 is uncertain and I believe that 6 was a buggy move to glibc2.0 that few people ever got a copy of, which was abandoned in favour of a move to glibc2.1 for version 7. They were versions, even if not general releases.
Of course, Slackware 96 is out there somewhere complicating things ;-)
On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 05:15:00PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 02:20:25PM +0100, Aquarius wrote:
And why Patrick decided to leap from Slackware 3.x to 7.0 directly, since everyone said "hey, why are you four major versions behind RedHat?" :-)
In defence, Slackware 4 was most definitely a real release, 5 is uncertain and I believe that 6 was a buggy move to glibc2.0 that few people ever got a copy of, which was abandoned in favour of a move to glibc2.1 for version 7. They were versions, even if not general releases. Of course, Slackware 96 is out there somewhere complicating things ;-)
Ah, that's what I get for relating apocryphal stories :) I gave up on SW a while ago -- I should probably keep in touch with it more...
Aq.
-
Andrew Savory -
Aquarius -
Green J M K -
Justin Jonas -
MJ Ray