Neill Newman neill@entora.co.uk writes:
Mark et al, I know that there is a lot to do, and I dont have time to do any right now, but can I make a suggestion.. Can the website be tested with the w3 vaildator (validator.w3.org). This makes sure it is proper html, at the moment there are a dozen or so errors ;(..
Don't exaggerate: there were four errors. It seems that sablotron is somewhat more primitive than luminas's tools and produces HTML 4.01 (*yuk!*) instead. One correction later, there are now no errors, at least in transitional. It shouldn't be too much work to make it pass strict if it's really needed, but that can wait a bit.
MJ Ray wrote:
Neill Newman neill@entora.co.uk writes:
Mark et al, I know that there is a lot to do, and I dont have time to do any right now, but can I make a suggestion.. Can the website be tested with the w3 vaildator (validator.w3.org). This makes sure it is proper html, at the moment there are a dozen or so errors ;(..
Don't exaggerate: there were four errors.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.anglian.lug.org.uk%2F&... 17 at my count.. some might be recursive though...
It seems that sablotron is somewhat more primitive than luminas's tools and produces HTML 4.01 (*yuk!*) instead. One correction later, there are now no errors, at least in transitional. It shouldn't be too much work to make it pass strict if it's really needed, but that can wait a bit.
sure, no probs... Sz
-
MJ Ray -
Neill Newman