Mark,
Just a quick question, why did you change the config of the list so that the reply-to stopped working? I liked it more the other way, any one else?
Cheers,
Brett
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 11:18:54AM +0000, Brett Parker wrote:
Mark,
Just a quick question, why did you change the config of the list so that the reply-to stopped working? I liked it more the other way, any one else?
I noticed that too and found it slighly unusual.
My work around is to use group reply" when I want to reply to the list which replies to everyone in the "To:" list as well as the "From:" or "Reply-To:" addresses.
The side effect of course is that the original poster gets two copies, one direct, and one via the list.
Steve.
Reply-to works just fine here, but then I took the time to rtfm ;P Just tell mutt that alug is a list, and then subscribe to the list, and you can use L to reply to the list and respect everyone else's reply-to's too. see the 'list' and 'subscribe' commands. See many, _many_, posts and web pages about why setting reply-to back to the list is considered broken. Cheers, -Thom * Brett Parker (brettp@stu.uea.ac.uk) wrote :
Mark,
Just a quick question, why did you change the config of the list so that the reply-to stopped working? I liked it more the other way, any one else?
Cheers,
Brett
alug, the Anglian Linux User Group list Send list replies to alug@stu.uea.ac.uk http://rabbit.stu.uea.ac.uk/cgi-bin/listinfo/alug See the website for instructions on digest or unsub!
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:00:55PM +0000, Thom May wrote:
Reply-to works just fine here, but then I took the time to rtfm ;P Just tell mutt that alug is a list, and then subscribe to the list, and you can use L to reply to the list and respect everyone else's reply-to's too. see the 'list' and 'subscribe' commands. See many, _many_, posts and web pages about why setting reply-to back to the list is considered broken. Cheers, -Thom
Hrmpf, fair enuff. never mind. that's mutt done...
Brett.
-
Brett Parker -
Steve Fosdick -
Thom May