What do people recommend for managing images (i.e. hundreds of digital camera pictures)? I don't fant a full blown image manipulation and album creation thing like digikam, I want a basic file manager that will show me thumbnail images and allow me to drag and drop them around the place.
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:22:16 Chris G wrote:
What do people recommend for managing images (i.e. hundreds of digital camera pictures)? I don't fant a full blown image manipulation and album creation thing like digikam, I want a basic file manager that will show me thumbnail images and allow me to drag and drop them around the place.
In that case just use Konqueror, which has varying degrees of image-orientatedness depending on what you want.
On 7/9/07, Ten runlevelten@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:22:16 Chris G wrote:
What do people recommend for managing images (i.e. hundreds of digital camera pictures)? I don't fant a full blown image manipulation and album creation thing like digikam, I want a basic file manager that will show me thumbnail images and allow me to drag and drop them around the place.
In that case just use Konqueror, which has varying degrees of image-orientatedness depending on what you want.
Or even Gnome's file manager, for those of a gnomish inclination.
Tim.
possibly a bit too bloated for your requirements but I find picassa quite useful. Seems to cope fine with 3000+ photos on a low spec machine and convenient upload to picassweb. I have to say though I havent played too much with the linux version
On 7/9/07, Tim Green timothy.j.green@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/9/07, Ten runlevelten@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:22:16 Chris G wrote:
What do people recommend for managing images (i.e. hundreds of digital camera pictures)? I don't fant a full blown image manipulation and album creation thing like digikam, I want a basic file manager that will show me thumbnail images and allow me to drag and drop them around the place.
In that case just use Konqueror, which has varying degrees of image-orientatedness depending on what you want.
Or even Gnome's file manager, for those of a gnomish inclination.
Tim.
main@lists.alug.org.uk http://www.alug.org.uk/ http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above!
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 03:27:14PM +0100, Ten wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:22:16 Chris G wrote:
What do people recommend for managing images (i.e. hundreds of digital camera pictures)? I don't fant a full blown image manipulation and album creation thing like digikam, I want a basic file manager that will show me thumbnail images and allow me to drag and drop them around the place.
In that case just use Konqueror, which has varying degrees of image-orientatedness depending on what you want.
Yes, that's pretty close to what I'm after, thanks. The only issue at the moment is that it's not displaying thumbnails for my .jpg files, it's just showing a camera icon. Is there a setting I can change somewhere so it shows thumbnails?
On Monday 09 July 2007 20:36:47 Chris G wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 03:27:14PM +0100, Ten wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:22:16 Chris G wrote:
What do people recommend for managing images (i.e. hundreds of digital camera pictures)? I don't fant a full blown image manipulation and album creation thing like digikam, I want a basic file manager that will show me thumbnail images and allow me to drag and drop them around the place.
In that case just use Konqueror, which has varying degrees of image-orientatedness depending on what you want.
Yes, that's pretty close to what I'm after, thanks. The only issue at the moment is that it's not displaying thumbnails for my .jpg files, it's just showing a camera icon. Is there a setting I can change somewhere so it shows thumbnails?
There are two possible settings that are relevant: photo view, a special mode which shows thumbnails down the right-hand side and a full view in the main body of Konqueror; and there's also the more generic icon view mode. Check Konqueror's Settings | Configure Konqueror | Previews and Metadata to make sure that the "file" protocol (under "Local Protocols") is checked and maybe increase the maximum filesize for previews. Note, however, that it takes longer to make thumbnails of larger images.
Also, have you seen pr0nview http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/pornview ;-)
Cheers, Richard
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:17:58AM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 20:36:47 Chris G wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 03:27:14PM +0100, Ten wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007 15:22:16 Chris G wrote:
What do people recommend for managing images (i.e. hundreds of digital camera pictures)? I don't fant a full blown image manipulation and album creation thing like digikam, I want a basic file manager that will show me thumbnail images and allow me to drag and drop them around the place.
In that case just use Konqueror, which has varying degrees of image-orientatedness depending on what you want.
Yes, that's pretty close to what I'm after, thanks. The only issue at the moment is that it's not displaying thumbnails for my .jpg files, it's just showing a camera icon. Is there a setting I can change somewhere so it shows thumbnails?
There are two possible settings that are relevant: photo view, a special mode which shows thumbnails down the right-hand side and a full view in the main body of Konqueror; and there's also the more generic icon view mode.
It seems to default to 'icon view' and that's the mode where it shows me just a collection of 'cameras', not actual thumbnails of my pictures. In 'photo view' I do get what you describe, thumbnails down the RHS and a larger view of the selected one.
How can I get the 'icon view' to show me thumbnails, that's what I really want.
CheckKonqueror's Settings | Configure Konqueror | Previews and Metadata to make sure that the "file" protocol (under "Local Protocols") is checked and maybe increase the maximum filesize for previews. Note, however, that it takes longer to make thumbnails of larger images.
Aha, that's how to do it, thanks! The 'file' protocol wasn't checked by default. Now I have just what I want.
Thanks again.
-
Chris G -
Richard Lewis -
Ten -
Tim Green -
Venura Mendis