Laurie wrote:
You may (perhaps fairly) think it's a bit harsh, but this is at least the third time he's done this, and I've asked him to stop twice (which he both failed to acknowledge, and ignored). Especially given its precedents, it *is* spam, however relevant it may be to any particular reader.
Laurie, this email was more of a grey area than previous messages, not being a "we've got this job" but a "where should we advertise". Of course, you could still count it as sneaky advertising, as most of the email is occupied by their contact details in a non-signature footer, but it can't really be classed as "spam"/UCE. However, what we saw was you stomping in there with the big boots on and threatening them on-list for what appeared an innocent message. No explanation of why you classed it as spam was given.
Please, everyone, if you suspect something of being spam, please contact the three of us at main-admin@lists.alug.org.uk and *we'll* get the big boots on. If you dislike our decision, *then* you can post to the list bitching about our decision and we'll back down if your opinion is the majority one.
I'm inclined to accept job adverts etc into announce@lists.alug.org.uk, mainly through the absence of any other material. Would people agree to that, as long as tough guidelines (eg no sigs, under a certain length, once per issue max) were set?
Further, Best International are members of ATSCO, and as any member of the PCG knows, not only supporters of IR35, but as members of ATSCO, they are acting in the worst interests of contractors (qv. statements from the ATSCO chairman passim). A cruise through the private fora in the PCG will show that Best are in fact misnamed... Consequently, I am unable to find any room for compromise.
Now this *is* interesting. I also dislike ATSCO because of their handling of this (even if I think that I broadly agree with the spirit (but not the letter) of IR35) and I think the only honourable thing for any member to do is to either resign or go on record with an open letter objecting to their handling of the affair.
Hi guys, watched this one with interest. Thought you were a bit harsh Laurie - chill a bit ;o). But since I got flamed for a large signature in the past : Gavin, TRIM THAT SIG, its a fair request !. While on the signature - I personally would be interested to receive posts from agencies onto the list, However I don't care who is "Official Winner" of anything to be honest. I am Official Winner of the Nicest Guy in my office award (1997,98,99,2000,01), Best Programmer to Ever Live Award (2001/01) and the Don't Sit Behind Him after He's had a curry Award (2001). But since these were all awarded by me to me they don't really count much (although you would be advised to pay attention to the latter!! ;oP). Sorry, being facetious - the point is that industry awards are a case of industry slapping themselves on the back - which anyone can do. The Only award I really care about is the "Found me a job at a great rate and sorted everything as instructed award", which I personnally give to those that deserve it having used their services. So far the sole holder of this award is Computer Futures. May be unfair so sorry if offends.
<snip>
A cruise through the
private fora in the PCG will show that Best are in fact misnamed... Consequently, I am unable to find any room for compromise.
</snip>
Laurie - could you gimme a link to this info (did a google - didn't get a noodle) - would be interested. [earl.brannigan@lindenhouse.co.uk] www.lindenhouse.co.uk Intellectual : Someone who can spend a whole day locked in a room with a tea cosy without once thinking of trying it on. Highbrow : Someone who can listen to the entire William Tell Overture without once thinking of the Lone Ranger.