Peter Naulls member of the ARM-Linux team is going to demonstrate installing Linux on an Iyonix. Castle's Iyonix (http://www.iyonix.com) is the first Xscale desktop computer. Mr Naulls is porting debian ARM-Linux to it, Debonix, see http://www.drobe.co.uk/riscos/artifact673.html Xscale is an ARM processor, a very popular low power cpu architecture. The meeting is at the upstairs room in the new Holy Trinty Church hall Cambridge Street at 7pm on the 17 July, the meeting will end by 10pm. http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=622165&y=307924&z=1&sv=C... Free parking is available at the church on Essex street, as well as free coffee,tea and biscuits. All welcome.
Tarquin Mills speccyverse@ntlworld.com wrote:
Peter Naulls member of the ARM-Linux team is going to demonstrate installing Linux on an Iyonix.
Whose meeting is this? Do you want ALUG to help advertise it? Who in Norwich is currently helping to advertise meetings? Can anyone else there give a little time to do so?
Mark Ray wrote:
Tarquin Mills speccyverse@ntlworld.com wrote:
Peter Naulls member of the ARM-Linux team is going to demonstrate installing Linux on an Iyonix.
Whose meeting is this? Do you want ALUG to help advertise it? Who in Norwich is currently helping to advertise meetings? Can anyone else there give a little time to do so?
This is the monthly meeting of RUNG, we would be delighted if ALUG would advertise it. I have accidentally sent the email to MJ Ray, for a second time because ALUG runs this silly policy where Reply-To is not set to the mailing list. Could this please please be changed.
Tarquin Mills speccyverse@ntlworld.com wrote:
time because ALUG runs this silly policy where Reply-To is not set to the mailing list. Could this please please be changed.
Until you or someone else can show how to do it without creating worse problems than misdirected replies of some silly RISC-OS users who can't control or fix their mail clients, no.
Please, anyone reposting should not include a bigger block of junk bitching about Reply-To than their message *unless* they are adding some new info to that debate.
speccyverse@ntlworld.com wrote on 23 June 2003 17:59:
This is the monthly meeting of RUNG, we would be delighted if ALUG would advertise it. I have accidentally sent the email to MJ Ray, for a second time because ALUG runs this silly policy where Reply-To is not set to the mailing list. Could this please please be changed.
Oh, FFS - we've been through all of this as to why the list's Reply-To function is as it is. It's the _default_ and _recommended_ behaviour for Mailman mailing lists. It makes sense - Reply will respond directly to the author, and Reply All will respond to the author AND the rest of the list. Mailman will also deal with any duplicates - if it detects that you're already subscribed to the mailing list but notices a private copy has already been sent it will not email out another copy to you.
If I can run many project-oriented Mailman lists at work without any complaints from the members, many of whom are not computer literate, then I fail to see why a LUG produces so many complaints!
Regards,
Martyn
-
Martyn Drake -
MJ Ray -
Tarquin Mills