THANKS FOR THAT BRETT VERY USEFUL LINK TA!
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:03:46PM +0000, Brett Parker wrote:
Hi,
Just thought that as we're getting a few more people joining the list, it would be good to actually start documenting the mailing list etiquette.
So, I've started a magic page on our wiki, if people have more to add to it, please feel free.
The page is: http://www.alug.org.uk/MailingListEtiquette
Cheers,
Brett Parker http://www.sommitrealweird.co.uk/ PGP Fingerprint 1A9E C066 EDEE 6746 36CB BD7F 479E C24F 95C7 1D61
main@lists.alug.org.uk http://www.alug.org.uk/ http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above!
On 14 Jan 15:25, Adam Bower wrote:
THANKS FOR THAT BRETT VERY USEFUL LINK TA!
Thanks for that Adam... now I've had to add another line to the wiki page to suggest not SHOUTING.
(and you deliberately broke the thread... I'll come and hunt you down at the beginning of Feb if you're not careful!)
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:41:43 +0000 Brett Parker iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk allegedly wrote:
On 14 Jan 15:25, Adam Bower wrote:
THANKS FOR THAT BRETT VERY USEFUL LINK TA!
Thanks for that Adam... now I've had to add another line to the wiki page to suggest not SHOUTING.
(and you deliberately broke the thread... I'll come and hunt you down at the beginning of Feb if you're not careful!)
Brett
You might like to consider adding these references. I find them useful.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html - how to ask questions the smart way
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html - List reply-to considered harmful.
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html - Reply-to munging still considered harmful. Really
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855 - RFC 1855
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2822.txt
Mick
(and you could always add a note to the effect that very long .sigs, coupled with PGP signatures are considered a pain by some. :-) )
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The text file for RFC 854 contains exactly 854 lines. Do you think there is any cosmic significance in this?
Douglas E Comer - Internetworking with TCP/IP Volume 1
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc854.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Brett Parker wrote:
On 14 Jan 15:25, Adam Bower wrote:
THANKS FOR THAT BRETT VERY USEFUL LINK TA!
Thanks for that Adam... now I've had to add another line to the wiki page to suggest not SHOUTING.
(and you deliberately broke the thread... I'll come and hunt you down at the beginning of Feb if you're not careful!)
Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu...
On 15-Jan-11 11:46:39, Anthony Anson wrote:
Brett Parker wrote:
On 14 Jan 15:25, Adam Bower wrote:
THANKS FOR THAT BRETT VERY USEFUL LINK TA!
Thanks for that Adam... now I've had to add another line to the wiki page to suggest not SHOUTING.
(and you deliberately broke the thread... I'll come and hunt you down at the beginning of Feb if you're not careful!)
Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu...
-- Tony Anson www.girolle.co.uk/
That's just rot, Tony! Ted.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.harding@wlandres.net Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 Date: 15-Jan-11 Time: 18:24:47 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:43:34 -0000 (GMT) (Ted Harding) ted.harding@wlandres.net allegedly wrote:
Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu...
-- Tony Anson www.girolle.co.uk/
That's just rot, Tony! Ted.
But it ain't 13
Mick ---------------------------------------------------------------------
The text file for RFC 854 contains exactly 854 lines. Do you think there is any cosmic significance in this?
Douglas E Comer - Internetworking with TCP/IP Volume 1
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc854.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------
mick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:43:34 -0000 (GMT) (Ted Harding) ted.harding@wlandres.net allegedly wrote:
Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu...
-- Tony Anson www.girolle.co.uk/
That's just rot, Tony! Ted.
But it ain't 13
I know - it's grown up a bit - to 14
On 15-Jan-11 20:15:57, mick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:43:34 -0000 (GMT) (Ted Harding) ted.harding@wlandres.net allegedly wrote:
Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu...
-- Tony Anson www.girolle.co.uk/
That's just rot, Tony! Ted.
But it ain't 13 Mick
caesar 12 <<EOT Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu EOT
--> And ther's another thing
caesar 14 << EOT And ther's another thing EOT
--> Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu
(If you have BSD games installed, which also includes rot13)
Ted.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- E-Mail: (Ted Harding) ted.harding@wlandres.net Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861 Date: 15-Jan-11 Time: 21:43:11 ------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
(Ted Harding) wrote:
On 15-Jan-11 20:15:57, mick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 19:43:34 -0000 (GMT) (Ted Harding) ted.harding@wlandres.net allegedly wrote:
Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu...
-- Tony Anson www.girolle.co.uk/
That's just rot, Tony! Ted.
But it ain't 13 Mick
caesar 12 <<EOT Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu EOT
--> And ther's another thing
caesar 14 << EOT And ther's another thing EOT
--> Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu
(If you have BSD games installed, which also includes rot13)
Leetkey has ROT13, but doesn't (didn't) work in TB3 - though I'm sure I could extract permission from a Sheddi to post here a reworked version that does.
(Ted Harding) wrote:
On 15-Jan-11 11:46:39, Anthony Anson wrote:
Brett Parker wrote:
On 14 Jan 15:25, Adam Bower wrote:
THANKS FOR THAT BRETT VERY USEFUL LINK TA!
Thanks for that Adam... now I've had to add another line to the wiki page to suggest not SHOUTING.
(and you deliberately broke the thread... I'll come and hunt you down at the beginning of Feb if you're not careful!)
Obr hvsf'g obchvsf hvwbu...
-- Tony Anson www.girolle.co.uk/
That's just rot, Tony!
Ah, but like a good Sauternes, a noble ROT.
-
Adam Bower -
Anthony Anson -
Brett Parker -
mick -
ted.harding＠wlandres.net