(Ted Harding) wrote:
> On 19-Aug-07 18:17:50, CDW (Linux) wrote:
>> (Ted Harding) wrote:
>>> There's a lot of possibilities for this!
>>>
>>> One thing to look at is whether you have a default gateway set up
>>> in Linux. If (as root) you enter the command
>>>
>>> route
>>>
>>> you should see somthing like
>>>
>>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>>> …
[View More]192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>>> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>>> default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
>>>
>>> where the "192.168.1.1" should be replaced by the IP address of
>>> your actual router. If you don't get a "default" line in the output
>>> from "route" then nothing for outside will get to the router.
>> I get the following :-
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 10 0 0 eth0
>> 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 10 0 0 eth0
>> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>> default 192.168.1.51 0.0.0.0 UG 10 0 0 eth0
>>
>> Ah. I've just noticed that there's a 169.254.0.0 address in my list.
>> That would appear to come from a DHCP config but I purposely didn't
>> set that so would that be stopping it working? If so, how do I remove
>> it?
>
> I don't think it matters. I get the same too (on a Red Hat 9 system)
> without any DHCP going on. It's supposed, I think, to represent some
> alternative network numbering, and as far as I know is simply a dummy.
Thanks for that info.
--
__ __| |_ __ __ .-----------------------------------------------.
/ _/ _` \ V V / | mailto:cdw_alug@the-walker-household.co.uk |
\__\__,_|\_/\_/ |_______________________________________________|
[View Less]
One of our servers did a strange thing today.
Suddenly at about half 11 this morning it remounted / as read only, I
have seen filesystems do this on boot when fsck was unable to repair
something automatically but this happened with an uptime of 80 days.
Nothing useful was written to the logs (presumably because they are on
the same mount point and hence also read only)
Seeing as it was in a ro state anyway I ran fsck on the ext3 filesystem
and it came back with a large number (100's) of …
[View More]errors, some of which
needed manual confirmation before they could be fixed.
However / being ro had made a mess of some of the processes that machine
runs so I gave it a reboot and everything came back as expected and with
an empty lost+found.
I ran smartctl on all 4 disks of the Raid 5 array and no errors have
been logged and disks look healthy. The mdadm shows all 4 disks as being
in normal mode and the array as being healthy.
I am going to run extended offline smart tests of the disks over the
weekend when the machine is less busy, but in the meantime can somebody
confirm that damaged filesystems remounting themselves as ro is normal
behaviour and if so what detects and schedules this ?
Also any ideas as to what (apart from faulty RAM which again I am going
to have to wait until the weekend to test) might have caused such
widespread corruption in the first place ?
[View Less]
It was the way OU said this on their web site that concerned me, Wayne. There is, as you suggest, always the possibility that the software will 'just work' but I felt it wise to check. Another thing. Linux friendly *external* DVD players? Any recommendations? Or can you plug and play with most? Thanks again.
Bev.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wayne Stallwood" <ALUGlist(a)digimatic.co.uk>
> To: ALUG <main(a)lists.alug.org.uk>
> Subject: Re: [ALUG] Open …
[View More]University and software
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:53:01 +0100
>
>
> On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 18:22 +0100, Bev Nicolson wrote:
> > I'm hoping to do some studying with the OU but looking at their
> > web site it basically says that they can't support Linux. I
> > thought I'd ask whether folk on this list have had any problems
> > with software incompatibility (which is for Windows but can, they
> > say, be used on Macs) and Ubuntu. Thanks.
> >
> > Bev.
>
> Not supported can often just mean "not tested on" if their site works on
> both Windows and Mac (and therefore presumably more than one browser)
> then there is a very good chance it will work on firefox on ubuntu.
>
> If software resources are made available for your your course outside
> the scope of the website then it may be that only Windows and Mac
> binaries are made available. Then your choice is to either experiment
> with Wine by following the recent thread on the main list or install
> Windows in a virtual machine (the virtual machine can be operated for
> free but you will need a Windows licence) and this being an option I
> would strongly recommend that you attend the next iplug meet as samwise
> is performing a demonstration.
>
> If the site just wont play in firefox on linux then a last resort may be
> http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/page/Main_Page, but that resource is
> intended more for site development than actually using a browser in
> anger.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> main(a)lists.alug.org.uk
> http://www.alug.org.uk/
> http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main
> Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above!
>
--
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze
[View Less]
I'm hoping to do some studying with the OU but looking at their web site it basically says that they can't support Linux. I thought I'd ask whether folk on this list have had any problems with software incompatibility (which is for Windows but can, they say, be used on Macs) and Ubuntu. Thanks.
Bev.
--
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze
Hello
Does anyone have a particular good reference guide/notes perhaps on
how to get WINE running? I've tried this before to allow me to use MS
Money through Linux but have had several problems. So now I have a
completely clean install of Kubuntu 7.04 and am ready to try WINE
again for MS Money. Any suggestions before I make a start would be
much appreciated.
Rgds
--
Yvonne Everett
Email: ye103910(a)googlemail.com
Hi Folks,
A new question! (All this up-to-date Linux stuff is
finding the gaps in my obsolete knowledge ...).
I'm currently trying (rather, wanting to try) running
X apps remotely on one of my machines, with Gentoo
running off the Live CD on the new laptop. So:
A = new laptop, latest Gentoo off live CD
X is Xorg
B = old laptop, Red Hat 9 from 2003.
X is X11R6
Normally, when I want remote X apps to display locally,
I enter
xhost +
locally, and get "connection is allowed from any …
[View More]host".
And it then works.
On A, I again enter "xhost +" and still get "connection
is allowed from any host". So far so good, it would seem.
However, A has no telnet client, and rlogin won't work,
soI have to use ssh to log in from A to B. This seems to
work: I log in, I can tour directories, etc.
B knows where I'm coming from:
B:$ who am i
ted ..... (192.168.1.8)
which is fine. But it hasn't attributed an X DISPLAY:
echo $DISPLAY returns null. So on B I set
export DISPLAY=192.168.1.8:0.0
which is what I'd normally do. But now, when logged in to B,
I issue
xterm
There is a delay, and then the message
xterm Xt error: Can't open display: 192.168.1.8:0.0
Does this have something to do with Xorg doing things differently
from X11R6? The process I went through above would have worked
between any of my X11R6 machines. Or might it have somthing to
do with my logging in using ssh rather than telnet (Machine B
is set up to be friendly to anything on my LAN 192.168.1.*).
Any suggestions appreciated!
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.harding(a)nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 27-Aug-07 Time: 18:00:54
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
[View Less]
Hi Again, with repeat apologies!
The laptop on which I propose to install Linux has
Windows Vista Home Premium pre-installed.
There is one hard drive: 120GB. Partition info
according to Vista is:
Vista (C:) 91.2GB free, 104GB total
System (S:) 1.41GB free, 1.46GB total
Gentoo finds the HD at /dev/sda, and fdisk gives:
/dev/sda1 Start=1 End=702 Blocks=5,632,000
ID=27 Type=Unknown
/dev/sda2 Start=702 End=893 Blocks=1,536,000
ID=7 Type=HP/NTFS
/dev/sda3 Start=893 …
[View More]End=14894 Blocks=110,050,304
ID=7 Type=HP/NTFS
Presumably (matching on partition size) /dev/sda2
is the 1.4GB "System" partition which Vista identified
(dunno what that's for, though; but at least it's a
known filesystem type). And of course /dev/sda3 is
the Big One, which Vista has all to itself.
And Vista does not see /dev/sda1 at all. This may be
something to do with machine boot-up, BIOS config,
diagnostics, or the like.
Anyway, my real question is to do with backing Vista
into a much smaller corner of /dev/sda3. Perhaps I'll
be benign and let it have as much as 40GB to run around
in, maybe less, however.
So this means resizing the /dev/sda3 partition, and
adding new partiitions in the space released. There
shouldn't be problems with the latter, once the former
has been done.
But this is the first time I've been anywhere near
an NTFS filesystem. While I've done this often enough
for DOS/VFAT systems, I don't really know what sort
of animal NTFS is, and how kindly it would take to
being "downsized".
Still less do I know what tool I should use for the
resizing, what dangers to watch out for (I don't really
want to zap Vista, since it sould come in handy sometime),
nor whether the Linux bootloader )e.g. GRuB) will work
smoothly with this setup. Also, will the fact that the
partitions do not begin and end on cylinder boundaries
(see above fdisk info) matter?
So I'd welcome experienced advice about these and any
related issues that need taking care of when installing
Linux alongside Vista.
With thanks,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.harding(a)nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 26-Aug-07 Time: 20:51:22
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
[View Less]
Hi Folks,
Apologies to any who receive cross-postings!
I'm poised to install Linux on a newly acquired laptop.
I've tried out the latest Ubuntu amd Gentoo live CDs,
and both work nicely. (Indeed, with their common
GNOME interface, there's isn't superificially much
difference between them). However, I've formed a
slightly happier impression of Gentoo (for reasons
which I can't quite put my finger on -- its more of a
"comfort" impression; also, the Gentoo live CD seems
to have more stuff to try …
[View More]out than the Ubuntu one does).
I'd be grateful for any guidance from folks who have
experiance of both, as to which may be the better one
for long-term use.
I'm also planning to give PCLinuxOS a whirl, and
maybe also Zenwalk, if anyone has comments.
Also feel free to advocate anything else! Essential
are good support for Intel 945GM Integrated Graphics
Controller (works with i810 driver), Synaptics touchpad
with USB mouse as alternative (I hate touchpads, but
this machine has no external PS/2 port ... ).
With thanks,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <ted.harding(a)nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 094 0861
Date: 26-Aug-07 Time: 20:27:47
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
[View Less]
Why are web browsers (well, Netscape and its descendents) so different
from all other programs?
All I want to do is run Firefox on another system on my (three
machine) network and it's very difficult!
My 'main' machine runs Slackware Linux and is in the house in my
office, it's on all the time so I can advertise the occasional web
page etc. It's the machine that appears on the web (at least as web
pages) as home.isbd.net.
I have set up another machine in the garage using tatty old hardware
…
[View More]so when I want to get some information (thread sizes for bolts, spare
parts for tools, wall plug sizes, etc.) I can do it there rather than
having to go back into the house requiring cleanness etc. As I want
access to the same home directory when I'm out there I have used NFS
to export my home and when I log in on the garage system I have all
the same files that I have on my office system.
Everything works fine *except* Firefox (well everything I've tried so
far that is). Firefox won't start on the garage system because it
sees the office system's Firefox lock file and says that Firefox is
running already and I can't have another one. I can think of various
ways around this issue (separate profile, don't use NFS but copy some
files across, etc.) but really why should I have to? Just about every
other program would run up a second instance without any bother at
all, why does Firefox do different? Netscape was the same, it's
"ancestral"! :-)
Other programs that create a lock file like this or a file with the
PID in it are server type programs where it makes sense (like mySql),
there having only one copy makes sense and I could use it from both my
garage and office systems at the same time without hassle. With
firefox though it's just a nuisance and I can't really come up with a
neat solution.
To describe the problem more completely:-
I have /home/chris is the *same* file system on both office and
garage computers, it's a local file system on the office computer
and an NFS export to the garage computer.
I have a few files that are different for the garage computer kept
in /home/chris/.garage, these are such things as my window manager
configuration because the garage computer has a lower resolution
display than the office computer.
I want office and garage computer firefox to share their
installation and configuration so that bookmarks and other things
are the same.
I just want to run firefox in the garage, but I can't!
Possible solutions seem to be:-
Run firefox in the garage with a separate profile, but I'm not
sure if this works completely and it means that I have to choose a
profile every time I start firefox. It also means that bookmarks
etc. are *not* shared so I have to do something about that.
Shut down firefox on the office system every time I leave it, not
really a sensible approach, I'll forget!
I can't think of any other ways to do it!
Oh, yes, there is another approach. Have an independent
/home/chris on the garage system and have symbolic links from
there to all the important directories in /home/chris on the
office system. Thus firefox has a local (and thus independent)
configuration/installation and I can just link bookmarks.html to
the office system one to get the same bookmarks. This also has the
advantage that the garage system will be more able to work without
the office system being there. It's probably the approach I will
take though I'm not quite sure how to keep the symbolic links up
to date.
--
Chris Green
[View Less]
Just a last minute reminder about tonight's ALUG meeting ...
Wayne, if you need anything else from me (stuff installed on PC, if
you need it etc.), let me know!
Peter.