main

main@lists.alug.org.uk

2 participants
10369 discussions

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

roundabouts (3), turn left at "T" junction (Pub on left) and follow road for about 2 miles.... On entering Cheveley, take first right up "High Street", carry on past church on left. Immediately after phone box on right, go through the gates, down to the bottom of the drive BIG HOUSE... Someone will be around to point you in the right direction..

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

first set of traffic lights (nr Nightclubs) in Newmarket turn RIGHT and follow road for about 3 miles.... On entering Cheveley, take first right up "High Street", carry on past church on left. Immediately after phone box on right, go through the gates, down to the bottom of the drive BIG HOUSE... Someone will be around to point you in the right direction..

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

right up "High Street", carry on past church on left. Immediately after phone box on right, go through the gates, down to the bottom of the drive BIG HOUSE... Someone will be around to point you in the right direction..

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

So it looks like USB mass storage devices can act like a SCSI adapter? -- If you like to shop at amazon, FreeBSD is for you. If you have a fast internet connection, and don't like paying for stuff, use NetBSD. If you find it hard to have a conversation with people because everyone is stupid compared to you, OpenBSD is the way to go.

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

(wd under NetBSD is pretty much the same as hd)

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

gone through betas 1, 2 and 3 and is now at RC (Release Candidate) 1. I expect it will be out within the next couple of weeks". Maybe Mandrake has addressed these issues as well as the ones you have highlighted. Cheers, BJ

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

its/it's, there/their/they're, practice/practise, dependent/dependant you cannot express yourselves clearly and accurately. If you cannot use your own native tongue accurately then I don't trust you know the rather subtle difference between, say, call-by-name/call-by-reference/call-by-value-copy-inout, when they are equivalent and when they are not. </rant> I shall now stop tearing out my hair, what's left of it, and resume a calmer tone .... -- Science is rapidly filling our homes with devices smarter than we are. - Anon Raphael Mankin E-Mail: raph(a)panache.demon.co.uk ----------------------------------

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

From: Alistair Davidson <lord_inh(a)yahoo.co.uk> Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 15:10:40 +0100 Now, if you think back to your economics classes, you'll remember that in an environment where competition exists, prices approach the marginal cost. So if it costs £100 to create a prototype, and £1 to produce each copy of that, the price shouldn't be too much higher than £1 once competition has come into play. Obviously, companies like to have a profit margin and need to recoup their initial investment, but certainly the cost of one unit should be under £1.50. Imagine that what you're producing is music, or software, or some other form of information. Suddenly, the marginal cost is extremely close to 0. In fact, it may be 0, with a one-off cost to seed distribution of your music, and all further distribution performed by your listeners. It seems ludicrous, in such an environment, to charge for distribution. The price tends towards the marginal cost, so the price of your music should be extremely low, if you allow listeners to make their own copies. What's needed is a way of covering that one-off cost. Companies and some individuals that profit from the sale of information would have us believe that a non-scarce resource should cost money. They try to enforce this idea by making a non-scarce resource scarce, using copyright laws. They talk of "intellectual property" and "copyright theft". But "intellectual property" is not like normal property. If I commit an act of "copyright theft", I don't deprive the owner of their "property", like with normal theft. So, how do you cover the cost of creation (as opposed to the cost of production/marginal cost, which is effectively 0)? There are a number of ways. The most popular right now is to charge for additional value that is sold on top of your product- for example, making CDs and charging money for them is okay, because there is a significant marginal cost, and your listeners gain value from things like sleeve notes, and the benefits of having the music on a physical medium. Red Hat software gives away its Linux distribution (you can download it from their website, and it regularly appears on magazine cover-disks), but if you pay them money they will also provide technical support, and an automated update service. Richard M Stallman, founder of the Free Software Foundation (that's free-as-in-freedom, not free-as-in-beer), supported himself for some time by giving away the Emacs text editor- he only charged if you wanted it on disk. He also made money by customising the software for companies- if a company wanted feature x, they could pay him to add it. Red Hat turned profitable earlier this year, in an environment where many established IT companies are struggling- even Microsoft is frantically trying to find new business models, because most people no longer see any need to upgrade to the latest version of Windows or Office or whatever, they had 95% of user's needs covered by Windows 98 + Office 97 + Internet Explorer 5.0. There's a second method, which is slowly gaining ground. This is to distribute your product free of charge, and ask altruistic listeners/readers/users to give you small donations if they like what you do- kind of like a busker. It sometimes helps to point out that if you don't receive enough donations to break even, you won't be able to offer music or your comic or your software any more. Kuro5hin.org gets money from advertising, and also offers an advertisement-free version, if you pay a subscription fee. Many online comics and garage bands also make money from selling t-shirts and so on. There's one final myth that needs to be exploded- that if there's no way to make money from software development / music / comics / book-writing / whatever, people will stop doing it. This is patently not true. You've been playing music for years, mostly at a loss. I have an online comic, which makes me no money but costs me none either. The world has thousands of garage bands and underground magazines and so on that barely cover their costs- why do they do it? The simple reason is that creating things is fun, and it's nice when people gain enjoyment from your work. Personally, I don't want art that's created solely for money- I'd rather have one decent amateur musician than a thousand Brittany Spears clones. It's like "the Economist" was saying a while ago; the music industry wants to create artificial scarcity of information not because this is the best way of ensuring future creation of art, or because it's best for the artists, or the public. They want artificial scarcity in order to protect their existing business models. I hope you can understand my position on copyright now. I don't necessarily want complete abolition, but huge reform is needed for copyright to keep in step with new technologies, and creating scarcity where none need exist is *not* the kind of reform I mean. I'd ask that if you agree with any of my arguments here, you carefully consider the license under which your music will be published, think about using the Electronic Frontier Foundation's Open Audio License for the works that are copyrighted to Tarneybackle, and your interpretations of traditional songs (can performances of traditional songs be copyrighted?). There's a FAQ about the license here: http://www.eff.org/IP/Open_licenses/20010421_eff_oal_faq.html The license itself is here: http://www.eff.org/IP/Open_licenses/eff_oal.html The GNU Free Documentation License, which is the license I intend to apply to the website, is here: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html -- Alistair --__--__-- Message: 4 To: announce(a)lists.alug.org.uk From: MJ Ray <markj(a)cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> Organization: Cat-killingly bad Date: 11 Sep 2001 00:56:59 +0100 Subject: [Alug Announce] [cedric.gauthier(a)soissons-technopole.org] [uklugs] European Free Software Contest From: cedric.gauthier(a)soissons-technopole.org Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:36:15 GMT Subject: [uklugs] European Free Software Contest European Free Software Contest The Soissons technopole is organising the first European Free Software Contest. European developers will be able to contest by registering their free software projects, during one year. Once a year, the handing out of awards is a way to make the best projects known to media, to allow easier meetings and to value new free software projects. All your suggestions are welcome, more particularly regarding these subjects : - Would you like to compete, what is the free software project you are working on,... ? - Where would you advise us to give information on this contest (web sites, universities, ...) ? Thanks for giving us your suggestions : cell(a)soissons-technopole.org -------------- Soissons-Technopole http://www.soissons-technopole.org/dom/cell.php tel : +33 3.23.76.40.36 --__--__-- Message: 5 To: announce(a)lists.alug.org.uk From: MJ Ray <markj(a)cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> Organization: Cat-killingly bad Date: 11 Sep 2001 17:06:09 +0100 Subject: [Alug Announce] UK leafletting campaign, Saturday 15th Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:55:15 +0100 Subject: [uklugs] UK leafletting campaign, Saturday 15th From: Jim Peters <jim(a)uazu.net> I've written to most of the LUG-Masters in the UK with a long E-mail outlining our plans for a nationwide day of action, handing out leaflets to raise public awareness about the EUCD + Dmitry Sklyarov, based on the current issue of 1,000,000 uncopyable audio CDs, intentionally corrupted and released into this country by the record companies. I asked them to forward the message to their mailing lists, but I suspect that many of them may have deleted it before they got as far as reading the request to forward it ! For this reason I'm writing this little E-mail to try and get in contact with more people before the weekend. We already have people planning to do leafletting in Rugby, Birmingham, London, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Sheffield and Glasgow. I would appreciate it if this message could be forwarded to all the LUG mailing lists, or any other relevant lists. If people are interested in reading more about the issues, and maybe joining us, they can check out the following site: http://uazu.net/cd/ http://uazu.net/cd/email.html This is just a small site setup to handle this weekend's campaign. For future campaigns and more general information, they can check out the main Campaign for Digital Rights site: http://uk.eurorights.org/ Many thanks - Jim -- Jim Peters (_)/=\~/_(_) Uazú (_) /=\ ~/_ (_) jim@ (_) /=\ ~/_ (_) www. uazu.net (_) ____ /=\ ____ ~/_ ____ (_) uazu.net --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Announce mailing list Announce(a)lists.alug.org.uk http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/announce End of Announce Digest

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

library must lift one of the main barriers to writing portable code, though there are other approaches to this, i.e. porting GUI toolkits from one platform to another so that code that uses the toolkit will be portable. The code generation for a virtual machine would obviously appeal to the writers of comercial software because it means they can distribute just one version of the software without having to give away the source code. What I don't see is how this is an advantage to free and open source software where the problem of distributing platform neutral code is usually solved by distributing the source. > I have not played with GJC yet so I can't commenet on that. For me, the interesting thing about GCJ is the claim to be able to translate the java VM code into native code ahead of time and save the result (as an ordinary executable) rather than do it each time the program is run. I am not sure how much difference this would make but it does seem to me that there is a noticable speed penalty associated with Java and this may be a way to remove it. I think it is very early days for GCJ though, so perhaps we need to wait a bit before it is fully usuable. > One Java compiler/runtime I may suggest looking at is Jikes > (from IBM). I used it a few years ago and was very impressed. > I'm not sure how well it plays with apache/java serverlets > though. I am pretty sure I have a Java run time environment from IBM installed at work in order to run the Oracle client tools (from the Oracle 8i). It seems to do this OK though there is some strangeness in that if one of these tools is run without a controlling terminal a java coredump occurs in one of the X libraries. Steve.

1 0

None
by None 29 Dec '21

29 Dec '21

language that C++ and pitched at a slightly higher level but not much which aims for platform indepenance via two mechanisms: 1. Compiling into code to run on a virtual machine rather than any real ones. 2. Including much more useful functionality in the standard library (such as a GUI toolkit) which means that many more things are done in a standard way.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

main