David Freeman <david_freeman(a)rocketmail.com> writes:
> > Anyway, imperative-OO still has "do this, do that" at its core...
> Not if used properly. its more on event x do y etc...
Still, imperative.
[...]
> True. I wasn't there so can't comment much. but how was the program
> spec defined?
I'm not too clear on that (I was just trying to assess technical
skills), but copiously specified by recognised experts from partner
institutions. ;-)
> prototypes? you design it in pseudo code,
Yippee, non-testable code!
> this then becomes your comments as you write code round them. All
> languages(well most) have the same basic principles of sequence
> selection and interation. Read Code Complete by Steve Mcconnell.
Is it a book, article, kiwi fruit, sth else? You're describing
imperative programming again, but that's irrelevant here.
--
MJR