main

main@lists.alug.org.uk

10364 discussions

Re: [Alug] RedHat 7.1 module compile problems
by Richard George 26 May '01

26 May '01

joe_frost(a)omnis-software.com wrote: > Has anyone had trouble with "make modules" on RedHat 7.1? > > There seems to be some errors in module.h Not using RH, but Mandrake 8.0 is completely up the spout when it comes to compiling modules (kernel 2.3...mdksomething). Knowing the supposed similarity of these two distros I have to wonder if there's a link. Anyone managed to recompile the kernel under 'drake 8? (PS: I hope this is the address I'm subbed from, apologies to the moderator if not). Richard

5 7

File systems and Kernel recompile
by David Freeman 25 May '01

25 May '01

I eventually bit the bullet and recompiled my kernel to version 2.4.4, and guess what, IT WORKED, well I was surprised Having done this I have some questions. 0)I missed a module out when I compiled the kernel, how do I compile just that module? 1)Would people recommend a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel for mission critical systems which need high availability? 2)What would people recommend in the way of journelling file systems? I think that was all. Thanks to all who advised me on my earlier kernel thread. Thanks D PS Mark: are all the admin messages archived in some shape or form? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/

3 4

Re: [Alug] Large text in Mandrake 7.2!?
by MJ Ray 24 May '01

24 May '01

terryfilby <terryfilby(a)netscapeonline.co.uk> writes: > [...] I wonder if it's just coincidence but 7.0 had Lilo only, whereas > 7.2 has Grub and Lilo, Grub has worked for me every time, could this be > the reason? Almost certainly. I knew Grub had to have some benefit other than just being run once and left alone! > One query about 7.2, sometimes the menu, root dialog etc > comes up with the text about half-an-inch high! Why does this happen and > how can it be solved? Programs still work as usual correct size, but, of > course, having text that large is awkward! Is this in X or on the text console? In X, it's probably due to select different font packages. In console, it's selecting a different font. -- MJR

1 0

RedHat 7.1 module compile problems
by Joe Frost 24 May '01

24 May '01

Has anyone had trouble with "make modules" on RedHat 7.1? There seems to be some errors in module.h Joe

4 3

Large text in Mandrake 7.2!?
by terryfilby 24 May '01

24 May '01

Since Linuxday when Mandrake 7.2 was kindly installed for me, I have re-installed it more than 20 times trying to get the ideal (for me) combination. It was great to at last be able to install a distro myself after all the one's I had tried in the past unsuccessfully! Included in these was Mandrake 7.0, which I tried again to see if I could install this, but the same result, installed ok, but couldn't boot back into Linux. I wonder if it's just coincidence but 7.0 had Lilo only, whereas 7.2 has Grub and Lilo, Grub has worked for me every time, could this be the reason? One query about 7.2, sometimes the menu, root dialog etc comes up with the text about half-an-inch high! Why does this happen and how can it be solved? Programs still work as usual correct size, but, of course, having text that large is awkward! Thanks Terry

1 0

Walnuts
by David Freeman 24 May '01

24 May '01

I am thinking that I might upgrade my kernel to 2.4 from 2.2.18. Is this a good idea? are there any major problems I should watch out for? When I do make menuconfig what options can be removed because they aren't going to be used on my athlon, other than th obvious? I also want to have all periferals configured to be configured as modules, is this easy enough? Also how much has it changed since 2.2* ? Thanks D __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/

4 6

Re: [Alug] Walnuts
by MJ Ray 23 May '01

23 May '01

David Freeman <david_freeman(a)rocketmail.com> writes: > I am thinking that I might upgrade my kernel to 2.4 from 2.2.18. Is > this a good idea? are there any major problems I should watch out for? You should grab Message-ID <slrn90o436.pkl.mjg59(a)cavan.jesus.cam.ac.uk> from uk.comp.os.linux, probably on http://groups.google.com/ or I can email it you. I don't think I've heard nasties about 2.4.4 yet, but earlier ones have serious gotchas. -- MJR

1 0

Re: [Alug] Next meet?
by MJ Ray 23 May '01

23 May '01

"Mark Wilkinson" <mark(a)wiggis.com> writes: > When's the next meet and where? It's looking like June 10th, UEA again. Still not confirmed, sadly. -- MJR

1 0

Re: [Alug] Next meet?
by Jenny_Hopkins＠toby-churchill.com 23 May '01

23 May '01

>When's the next meet and where? I think it is the 17th June at UEA, someone is seeing if a room is available then, I think. Jen

1 0

Re: [Alug] ALUG Library ...
by Andrew.Chandler＠ft.com 23 May '01

23 May '01

I think Adrian was saying it should be written in vi... err.. emacs rather than Lyx! Cisco's?? Been there done that! Bing Neill Newman <neill(a)entora.co.uk> on 04/05/2001 13:37:34 To: Andrew Chandler/PSD/LONDON/FTI@FTI cc: alug(a)stu.uea.ac.uk Subject: Re: [Alug] ALUG Library ... Andrew Chandler wrote: > > 'Word produces HTML", but that's no excuse!! > You tell him Adrian! err.. what's that got to do with the price of eggs, LaTeX is LaTeX no matter how it is written ;).. go and break some cisco's ;).. Sz > > Bing > -- Open source solutions at http://www.entora.co.uk/ ********************************************************************* * Please visit the web site of the Financial Times at: * * http://www.ft.com * * * * For UK personal finance, please visit http://www.ftyourmoney.com * * * * This E-Mail is intended for the use of the addressee only and may * * contain confidential information. If you are not the intended * * recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination * * of this communication is strictly prohibited. * * If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us * * immediately then delete this E-Mail. * * * * * postmaster(a)ft.com * *********************************************************************

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

main