Ted Harding wrote: [...]
I have just (08:40 BST, 30 Sept) received Sam Tuke's posting dated Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:02:04 +0000. [...]
Is there a problem?
There's also a X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:38:09 +0100 header, so it wasn't a technical problem at earth.li. Why was it held for moderation? I'm guessing, but 1. it quotes the entire digest; 2. it has a poor subject line; 3. it's html email. Why was it let onto the list? I don't know. I think it should have been returned to the sender with a polite pointer to a "how to write an email for a discussion list" guide. Having badly-titled, top-post-whole-quote-digest emails is a drain on the community, making every reader waste time reestablishing context, instead of the sender spending a little more time to write the email. All are welcome, but please try to write easy-to-read emails. Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray (slef) LMS developer and webmaster at | software www.software.coop http://mjr.towers.org.uk | .... co IMO only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html | .... op