On 2004-11-03 15:25:44 +0000 Brett Parker iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk wrote:
Two words: SUCKS [...]
Brett, you've discussed your anatomy twice on the mailing list so far today. Maybe postpone and redraft the next one? There might be sensitive city gents reading.
I've seen encouraging emails about free Java systems at http://cscience.org/pipermail/gobo-l/2004-October/005268.html and http://cscience.org/pipermail/gobo-l/2004-October/005272.html so maybe soon you'll be able to use Java again. I'm sure you'll be happy about that. ;-)
Back to the issue: Mark, I honestly don't know, but I wouldn't be at all suprised if it was treated as different things by different people, possibly even defining a new type for it. What do gnu.org suggest?
I don't know. I looked at the GNU coding standards http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_toc.html and the GNUstep coding standards http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/CodingStandards/cod... without figuring it out. Am I blind or not?