On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:43:44 +0000, Brett Parker iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk wrote:
On 06 Dec 13:29, Anthony Anson wrote:
BAH! Just hit 'send' innit!
Sorry Brett
Brett Parker wrote:
On 06 Dec 12:34, Anthony Anson wrote:
Steve Engledow wrote:
Id love a new Mac but cant afford it.
No you don't, that's just the conditioning talking ;)
*I'D* love a Mac too - there are things a Mac can do in its sleep that Linux and Windows make a banquet of.
Erm, such as?
Multitracking and layering music, and tweaking individual tracks for one.
That's not an operating system feature, that's a software feature. And I believe that audacity is capable of this.
Bugger Audacity, Ardour is where it's at and it's frelling fantastic!
*queue automatic response that it doesn't do MIDI /yet/*
Ardour sits on top of Jack (and can take advantage of ALSA MIDI also for those applications that don't do Jack MIDI) so you can use whichever MIDI sequencer alongside Ardour and it'll be in perfect sync. When you're ready for the mixdown, simply set up (a) channel(s) in ardour to capture the output(s) of your MIDI devices(s) and you're away :) I personally like qtractor for MIDI and sometimes use hydrogen for drums - though hydrogen sucks if you like to use different time sigs.
</ardourfanboi>
Steve
P.S. I didn't reply to Brett this time \o/