On Sun, 5 Sep 2010 18:38:23 +0100 Martyn Drake martyn@drake.org.uk allegedly wrote:
<advert> I should mention work for a company called Memset Ltd. (http://www.memset.com) and we provide both dedicated and virtual machines (based on Xen). Prices are cheaper than that of Bytemark, and we've been in the virtualisation game as long as their have - if not longer. Therefore if there anybody is looking for an alternative to Bytemark or similar, we may be able to help.</advert>
I feel I should mention that memset are the only UK based ISP I have approached who declined to let me run a tor node. They were polite, but clearly didn't want any possible hassle.
I have run tor on bytemark, rapidswitch, tagadab, daily and thrust. I eventually settled on using daily and thrust simply because they offer the lowest prices for the highest bandwidth (750 and 1000 gig pcm respectively). Tor obeys a sort of network version of parkinson's law.....
Mick ---------------------------------------------------------------------
The text file for RFC 854 contains exactly 854 lines. Do you think there is any cosmic significance in this?
Douglas E Comer - Internetworking with TCP/IP Volume 1
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc854.txt ---------------------------------------------------------------------