On 2003-11-14 18:44:19 +0000 Wayne Stallwood <ALUGlist@digimatic.plus.com> wrote:
Of course this is designed for heavier use than a £50 home office printer. So it comes at a higher price, but like they say you get what you pay for. To be honest if I was ever to buy another Inkjet, it would be one of these.
This looks like a cue for a bit more detail from me: it's for occasional printing, but it would be nice to have photo-quality colour printing for camera pictures. We were looking at things a bit over £100, but Epson just changed their range on us and I remember past ink cheats of theirs. It looks like the story so far is: Lexmark have patchy drivers; Canon are GNU/Linux-unfriendly; Epson have good drivers, but may rob you blind if the third party ink makers don't avoid the problem; HP have good drivers for most printers, but may do ink tricks too. I hate peripherals. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/