On 2003-09-15 20:09:14 +0100 (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding@nessie.mcc.ac.uk> wrote:
There's a possible confusion here (apologies if I'm wrong in your case, but what you write sugegsts it). What you call "c-circumflex (Slavic)" is not c-circumflex but c-hacek (the accent is like an upside-down circumflex), as in Czech.
No, I mean c-circumflex from the ISO-8859-3 (Southern European) encoding. Sorry for using the imprecise term "Slavic" (I knew the encording began with S, but didn't look up the proper name). As I'm typing across 3 of the ISO Latin character sets (-1, -3 and -15), I do already have the machine configured for UTF-8, as far as I can tell. Some applications with alternative input methods (yudit, qemacs) can display all the characters, so that's why I think it is an input configuration problem rather than a font problem. I could be wrong. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ slef@jabber.at Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/