26 Apr
2002
26 Apr
'02
12:51 p.m.
xs@kittenz.org xs@kittenz.org wrote:
Apparently, it's the APSL. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/apsl.html Something was quite amusing: * It is not a true copyleft, because it allows linking with other files which may be entirely proprietary. (copyleft != freedom)
Given that it is known (indeed, said elsewhere on that site) that there are non- and weak-copyleft free licences, what is amusing about that statement of fact?