4 Apr
2008
4 Apr
'08
7:30 p.m.
Brett Parker iDunno@sommitrealweird.co.uk wrote:
As I understand it, from what I read, this is nothing more or less than Yet Another implementation of DKIM[0].
Aren't Yahoo still claiming they have software patents on DomainKeys and threatening to drag any users to Californian courts?
Why not just use GPG extensively, make everyone sign their mail, and only accept mail that has a trust path to your key... that's almost as sane (and very obviously flawed).
I thought we were discussing GPG here, but I see it wasn't explicit.
Regards,
--
MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small
worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
(Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237