On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 at 17:56, Dennis Dryden <ddryden@gmail.com> wrote:
What did you find?
TBH I didn't get any better suggestions than the Microserver. For my purposes we just needed to quote for the hardware and we don't have an order yet so I'm still interested in alternatives, but will go the Microserver route by default.
If you only need 200GB of replicated data SSD’s might be a better idea these days.
Agreed, that's one change we will make. It means it'll boot more quickly (although each new Microserver seems to take longer to "POST" in my experience and the boottime after that is insignificant by comparison), and will re-sync more quickly on disk replacement, but otherwise there's no real end user gain from SSD for this application. -- Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0344 251 1450 Registered in England (0456 0902) 21 Drakes Mews, Milton Keynes, MK8 0ER