First I would like to know if anyone reading this list has any affinity for the ideas I'm proposing. If no one here wants organised talks / lectures, which implies a slightly more formalised structure to ALUG meetings, then so be it. Unless there are others who would attend these and would enjoy them then clearly there is no little point anyone bothering further.
OK, so here's a list of items I'd like some 'talks' on. And before anyone answers any of these with a simple "oh that's easy to answer, all you have to do is . . " please remember that this is not the same as a talk on a subject, where those listening can break in from time to time to get a point explained again or in a different way. Where at the end you can ask to go over an issue again, or perhaps have a further chat with the speaker.
Mail lists like these are great but only can cover certain types of queries well.
A beginners Linux course / talks perhaps some of the following could be covered. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) At any one time, in the Windows world there is really only one OS and one desktop. In the Linux world there are many dozens. A breakdown of what's available, which is better for certain tasks, what differences there are between them and covering which issues are significant to beginners. 2) How does Linux differ from Windows. Is this important? (Only a very little politics, I mean in broad operational tasks) 3) Do all Linux flavours use the same disk operating system? How does this compare to FAT & NTFS etc. 4) Linux flavours - is it best to stick to one, better to run more than one for different tasks etc. 5) Given we do not want to become system administrators, and are home users, discuss "what" we need to learn to (1) get started, (2) progress to a moderate level of expertise. i.e. at what point is a knowledge of command line commands absolutely necessary - if it is. 6) A beginner's lecture on what Linux is, how it differs from Unix, if the difference between Linux variants is important or not. Can you load a Unix program on a Linux system if the need arose? 7) A run down of the Linux directory structure - where programs are, where your data should go. What goes in the other areas. What we can mess with. What we shouldn't. 8) How to manage the system / how to handle backups. Is there a built in backup program, if not discuss 3rd party options. 9) How to install programs. How to delete a program. How to upgrade a program. What's and when to use a binary/source/rmp/deb install? 10) How to flatten a hard disk, if I want to try out a different version of Linux. 11) After installing a new or second hard disk - how to fdisk / format (windows terms I'm afraid) once it's installed. Learn which files can be moved to the new disk, which can't, or doesn't it matter? 12) An in depth of how 3rd party programs are installed. How to do it, how to set them up, etc. E.g. some seem allied to Red Hat - if they are, can they still be loaded and run in another's Linux version etc. 13) Show us the different desktops - KDE, Gnome & others etc., with a discussion about their differences. Discuss whether its useful to have different desktops installed for different functions. 14) Discuss simple console line commands. Do we really need these? What can they do that an equivalent software pop up window can't? 15) Explain what X windows is. (I think this is what it was called.) 16) How to open multiple windows, that reopen where they were opened before. Is this a problem with my version of Linux, or a KDE issue, or what? Last OS I used that worked properly was OS/2. 17) How to set up an old PC as a firewall / email handling box on a simple home network. 18) How to install fonts. Xandros seems poor here - maybe that's only Xandros.
Software demonstrations : ------------------------- 1) Open Office - well why not? By someone who knows the similarities / differences, and can demo a few interesting advanced features. 2) A look at other options for word processor. Vi is often mentioned but is said to be complex. Is this so? 3) Apache - yes I'd like to have and run a server at home to simulate an ISP, with ancillary software integrated. A simple look at all this would be interesting. 4) Demo of Windows applications running on Linux boxes. So terrible? 5) MySQL - A number of web sites seems to use it, a basic starter would be good. Is it a good GP database for storing home user info on? 6) PHP - often allied with MySQL. Another basic starter, and good to demo what it can and can't do.
Does this sound like a full time college course? Possibly, but covering just a few topics would be a start. I've hastily made this list not with the intention of asking ALUG to cover them all - obviously impossible, but there must be ALUG members reading this who know a piece of Linux software well and who would be happy to share their knowledge for a short period to beginners, and perhaps others in the group would be interested as well.
~~~~~~~
Adam
Why can you not arrange a series of lectures? If you take care of the organising bits that only leaves you to find some people willing to talk.
Er, with that suggestion, what else is there left to do? No, if this has to happen it surely has to happen as a group exercise led preferably by the current ALUG organisers, or if not by a number of interested people - or not at all. In any case it would be difficult to start something like this against the background of disapproval that seems to be present. I'm willing to do my bit, but to simply off-load the creation of a series of talks onto a beginner, and ask me to find and organise all the speakers is not really on is it? One of the points of the Alug group is surely that over the years advanced Linux users will get know one another, and a little of what they do. Those currently running the group are correct to cajole the rest of us for being inactive. As I said I'm willing to help. But other than my home town I cannot reasonably be expected to publicise any talks further afield. Once an event is confirmed, I'm happy to create a web page to publicise it - for the organisers to add to the ALUG site.
That's what I'm doing - asking for them.
The way you asked was to say that the meetings were not worthwhile and say that Alug was not doing enough.
What I said was "I've been to four of five ALUG meetings and to *me* they're a waste of time." I was not saying they were not worthwhile to others. Over time the number that attend these meeting will show how this is viewed. As to ALUG not doing enough, I am of course trying to produce constructive criticism here. I doubt the group will be damaged by reading my comments. If enough agree, then the group will move in a certain direction. If they don't, well things can continue as now.
That is not a very good way to get on the right side of people, a much more tactful way of doing it would be to say something along the lines of . . .
Please let's not reduce this to a review of words used. I intended to open this topic up to see if other felt the same. If I don't state what I think, the debate is pointless.
If you try and start the program you could arrange all of the above, the only thing you need is some willing volunteers (or victims) ;) to do the training.
Joking or not, I'm saddened if anyone contributing their knowledge and skills to others who wish to learn should see it in this light. I certainly do not want to impose an unpleasant task on anyone. It's peoples free time after all, and it really has to start with their volunteering.
Again I think this is a chicken and egg scenario, people don't want to be bothered sorting this kind of thing out without people asking. You could try and find 9 more people willing to pay for a days introduction and then ask here for people willing to do it.
I think this is the wrong way round. This may be valid in a company setting - where you want to train a group - so you approach someone to do it and set it up in house. My intention here was to see if anyone in the group just happened to be a trainer, who from time to time conducted courses in this region, and who would be interested in helping the group. Once you have a face in the slot, and a willingness to tackle a subject, then you can try publicising it to see if there's interest. That's the chicken and egg from my perspective.
Also once you get into this realm of paying for something then it needs even more pre-planning and needs good advance notice etc. Hence college courses I suppose. Unfortunately a commercial training project also suffers from the problem that it's less easy to persuaded shops & businesses to publicise your talks with leaflets if they feel that they're being used to surreptitiously advertise a commercial project for free.
I'm sorry you seem to be rather against this idea and do not find any value in it. Unless a number of others come forward to express a positive endorsement to these ideas, it shows I'm clearly out of step with the group.
_________________________________________________________________ Get Hotmail on your mobile phone http://www.msn.co.uk/msnmobile