I find it odd that you seem so dismissive of this report. If, in your opinion you believe it to be "bollocks" you should back that up with some evidence.
The report is based on tests that would appear to be fair and carried out under independent arbitration by a respected 3rd party. The representatives of Linux had every opportunity to exercise their OS against NT and the conclusions made were based on benchmark evidence rather than rabid, anti-Microsoft drivel.
Don't get me wrong I am not a die-hard Microsoft fan, far from it. I work for a company that runs both OS's but I'm not going to recommend my Directors to spend £x thousands of pounds on kit and software unless it meets important criteria of manageability, support and scalability.
Clive
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Smith [mailto:daniel@capricorn1.demon.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 10:10 PM To: alug@stu.uea.ac.uk Subject: [alug] Check this old bollocks out!
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/news/msnw/LinuxMyths.asp
I'm sorry but it's got to be true if Microsoft say so!
:o) -- Daniel Smith
[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]
[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]