On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 11:47:48AM +0000, Mark Rogers wrote:
Chris G wrote:
I was just looking around at alternatives to Vmware and saw VirtualBox, does it basically 'feel' like Vmware in the way it works? I.e. I can just install XP as a guest and run things in the guest while the rest of my Linux box is just that, a Linux box?
Yes to all that. It does some things better, others not so well, from what I can tell so far.
Stuff like shared folders (which the freebie VMWare stuff doesn't support) are there, for example.
If its home use and you go with the free-beer-not-speech version you get other stuff like USB support (inc USB2), client-server model like VMWare Server, including remote USB support. I've not tried any of that, so I have no idea how good it is, and it may be that by losing the free-as-in-speech you also lose the kernel update flexibility. (I'm very new to VirtualBox as I mentioned!)
VirtualBox has downloads for Fedora if you want to try it: http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads
OK, thanks. I currently have Vmware Workstation, recently upgraded to version 6.01. It's worth the cost for the simplicity for me, but if VirtualBox is somewhere near the same place then I'm very happy to save some money! :-)
While Access is my major need there's enough other bits and pieces (e.g. web sites that only work with IE, odd word documents that won't open in OO) that a 'real' Windows XP is the easiest solution.
IE on Wine is easy (and means you can have IE6 and IE7's rendering engines on the same PC for development tests), but I wouldn't know about VirtualBox and VMWare if I didn't know where you were coming from!
-- Mark Rogers // More Solutions Ltd (Peterborough Office) // 0845 45 89 555 Registered in England (0456 0902) at 13 Clarke Rd, Milton Keynes, MK1 1LG
main@lists.alug.org.uk http://www.alug.org.uk/ http://lists.alug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/main Unsubscribe? See message headers or the web site above!