Anthony Anson tony.anson@zetnet.co.uk wrote:
And posted his reply to the list.
Ah! I've just realised I posted a 'reply to sender' whereas I meant to post to the list. Bother! I really must try and post this to the list!!!
BTW, your [2]: is falling foul of my spamtrap, and I've tried to make an exception of the subject line with Re:, without Re: and just the subject, and I've tinkered with the filter five times, reprocessed the packet five times and it's eaten it five times.
Poor thing must be hungry. I've never fallen foul of a spam trap before - how exciting. What ever would it do with Re[4]. Incidentally it's my mailer that does that not me - honest.
Barry Samuels http://www.beenthere-donethat.org.uk The Unofficial Guide to Great Britain
The message 20031127194938.901413D@dataman1.ibmpeers from bsamuels@beenthere-donethat.org.uk (Barry Samuels) contains these words:
BTW, your [2]: is falling foul of my spamtrap, and I've tried to make an exception of the subject line with Re:, without Re: and just the subject, and I've tinkered with the filter five times, reprocessed the packet five times and it's eaten it five times.
Poor thing must be hungry. I've never fallen foul of a spam trap before - how exciting. What ever would it do with Re[4]. Incidentally it's my mailer that does that not me - honest.
Et it innit.
However,
re[[]#]: [[]alug] *
instead of re[[]2]: [[]alug] *
coffed it up again - or rather, tole it not to eat it next time whatever the (single digit) number.
-
Anthony Anson -
bsamuelsļ¼ beenthere-donethat.org.uk