Working for company where I have to support W95, W98 and NT4 I would much rather every one had NT4. Yes it does not support the range of hardware, but then it also allows to me to say we will use this harwdware configuration and any thing else and your on your own. As an aside though I run NT on an IBM Thinkpad 770X and getting SuSE 6.2 running was a damn site easier than NT4.

"John Woodard" jwoodard@tesco.net on 11/12/99 07:11:37 PM

Please respond to alug@stu.uea.ac.uk

To: alug@stu.uea.ac.uk cc: (bcc: Tony Sale/Technical Consultants/Procon)

Subject: [alug] Good old MS!

NT4 isn't much better IMHO. I'm sure that every time I walk past a machine running NT the screen goes blue. Last time I went into Suffolk College IT dept. I was asked politely to leave. <G>

Cheers, BJ ----- Original Message ----- From: Laurie Brown laurie@brownowl.com To: alug@stu.uea.ac.uk Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 12:12 PM Subject: [alug] Good old MS!

http://www.zdnet.com/pcweek/stories/columns/0,4351,2386174,00.html

ArfArf!

Cheers, Laurie.

[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]

[ This email came to you via the Anglian Linux User Group list ] [ If you only wish to recieve event announcements, email the ] [ SUBJECTs of "unsubscribe alug" and "subscribe alug-announce" ] [ to listserver@stu.uea.ac.uk -- We do need your support, tho' ]