Ricardo:
Could the same be done with php? Would it require too much setting up?
If you mean "are there wikis in php", I would expect so almost certainly.
If you mean "can we allow arbitrary php in a wiki-style system", then hahahahahahaha no.
Could we use some kind of php Nuke/postnuke solution? (I might be missing something here)
I have one under development that we could use, but I didn't see ALUG as being that sort of site. Indeed, the Zope edition of the site had a squishdot which did SFA for its whole life.
Are these valid alternatives? It really depends on what we want out of it, surely? It doesn't seem to clear to me what we actually want from the site.
Other than the basic info, it's no longer clear to me. I think it's to have some sort of "infobase" that we can store useful bits of info in easily for other group members. If we could attach files to it, it would get the suckers off the mailing list for good ;-)
We *should* consider some restriction IMHO, as there are plenty more scriptkiddies and other destructive vermin than there are responsible people...
Pessimist. I disagree (about the numbers, not the need for some authentication).
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 01:20:04AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
We *should* consider some restriction IMHO, as there are plenty more scriptkiddies and other destructive vermin than there are responsible people...
Pessimist. I disagree (about the numbers, not the need for some authentication).
I'm with Mark on this one. We have backups, and I think Wiki's are nicest if you can just add your $0.10 without having to log in every time. If people start abusing the privalage, we have several options:
* Hunt them down by IP address and feed them to Fluffy[*] * Hunt them down by IP address and feed them a batch of my latest cullinary creation. * Lock the security down after restoring from a backup.
(in order of probability, least to most)
P.
[*] Fluffy only available in the Harry Potter universe. Batteries not included.
Mark:
If you mean "are there wikis in php", I would expect so almost certainly.
yes, see: http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net
We use it for our internal procedure documentation, to very good effect.
We use htpasswd type logins to protect our wiki - the login name is picked up by the wiki, and tagged onto any changes that are made.
cheers,
John.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, John Billings wrote:
We use htpasswd type logins to protect our wiki - the login name is picked up by the wiki, and tagged onto any changes that are made.
... which I would suggest we use as a minimum. I don't suppose the owner of the server would be entirely happy at anyone being able to type in any old trash. We could either have a single username/password (eg username alug, password wiki) or individual ones.
Andrew.