Does anyone know of a BSD-ish ports tree being developed for Linux? Either currently, or a project in the past? Is it worthwhile, or does a suitably structured source directory and some discipline make it irrelevant?
MJR
In article 87em0ynp0m.fsf@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk you wrote:
Does anyone know of a BSD-ish ports tree being developed for Linux? Either currently, or a project in the past? Is it worthwhile, or does a suitably structured source directory and some discipline make it irrelevant?
I'm certainly not aware of anything of that sort. I suspect that it would be irrelevant, given a decent packaging system; Debian, for example, has apt-get, which will happily get source for you, and I can't imagine it would be amazingly hard to build a shell script that would get the source and put it in an appropriate place in your sources tree, and then invoke debbuild or dpkg-buildpackage on it. Are you thinking of a more generic solution, rather than something tied to one specific packaging method?
Aq -- note that my answer for "generic solution" is "make everyone use .debs" ;-)
I do know some lunatic has created a perl script to turn Debian's package management infrastructure into a ports tree, but I imagine that would be somewhat unwieldy. It's a damn cool idea though - I love the ports tree system, if only keeping it up to date was a bit less hacky. Time for some perl magic and the freshmeat DB? -Thom
* MJ Ray (markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk) wrote:
Does anyone know of a BSD-ish ports tree being developed for Linux? Either currently, or a project in the past? Is it worthwhile, or does a suitably structured source directory and some discipline make it irrelevant?
MJR
alug, the Anglian Linux User Group list Email: alug@stu.uea.ac.uk http://rabbit.stu.uea.ac.uk/cgi-bin/listinfo/alug See the website for instructions on digest or unsub!
-
Aquarius -
MJ Ray -
Thom May