Colin Hards wrote:
>First I would like to know if anyone reading this list has any affinity
for
>the ideas I'm proposing. If no one here wants organised talks / lectures,
>which implies a slightly more formalised structure to ALUG meetings, then
so
>be it. Unless there are others who would attend these and would enjoy them
>then clearly there is no little point anyone bothering further.
Colin - regarding what I said in a previous post about beginners v.
gurus.....everyone in alug has something to learn, and all will benefit
from any talks given, perhaps including the talker. We've long rattled on
about giving talks and as I also said previously, they haven't happened
simply because no-one has got around to organising a meeting structure. I
usually find if there *has* been a talk I've missed it, as it was being
given by what appeared to be a bunch of people chatting about something
else while I was purloining some form of help or other for some box or
other in the opposite side of the room.
Re. Keith's post about ALUG members having a willing spirit but little
time, perhaps rather than roll out a series of talks planned for such and
such a meeting, we should take it one at a time? That way they won't
fizzle out as soon as one of the talkers realises they can't make a meeting
that had been planned months before, kind of thing.
As for asking questions on list - I think I take the prize for that,
certainly last year's, so fire away, you won't be the worst! Search the
archives for proof!
(Most people still seem to be on speaking terms with me...)
Jenny