> From: Adam Bower Sent: 05 October 2005 09:19
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 11:47:39PM +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> >
> > We have had edits to our (HantsLUG) wiki from the USA and Sweden
> > recently. The people who made those edits made valuable
> contributions
> > to the site, but they're not on the mailing list.
>
> I figure a 2 (or is this 3?) tier-system of having approved
> users with username/password who can do what they want. Then
> having "approved"
> users who have made (for example) 3 edits in the past that
> have been approved by a moderator (have a moderation feed via
> rss?) and work out who they are by cookies or hostname etc.
> Then have "unapproved" users who are welcome to edit the wiki
> but have to give an email address when editing, these edits
> will then be approved via the moderators using rss (if they
> so wish, the exact mechanism could be via a webpage and email
> too) then if the moderators recognise the email address,
> person, valid contribution etc. then they can whitelist
> further edits from this user?
>
> You are then avoiding having to have any passwords (which are
> a pain to
> remember) but just using an email address to authenticate the
> user, which in this situation is *more* than good enough. If
> a user then "turned rogue" you just remove their email
> address from the list of users able to make edits.
sounds like it could work, like the idea of avoiding passwords via a
whitlist of email addresses.
How much work is involved in the implementation?
Regards,
Keith
____________
CORSAIR, n. - A politician of the seas. - Ambrose Bierce - The
Devil's Dictionary