main

main@lists.alug.org.uk

10364 discussions

Re: Get ready for the 12 Days of WHISKAS
by MJ Ray 10 Dec '00

10 Dec '00

12days(a)12daysofwhiskas.co.uk writes: > You have been sent this e-mail because your friend Terry Filby thinks you > may enjoy the 12 Days of WHISKAS Web site. Terry will cease to be anything approaching a friend if he keeps feeding email addresses of people he knows to spammers. [...] > To unsubscribe from the 12 days of WHISKAS click on > http://www.12daysofwhiskas.co.uk/unsubscribe.asp. What a surprise, that website is down. Complaint filed. -- MJR

1 0

Re: [Alug] Getting rid of a Linux boot loader
by MJ Ray 10 Dec '00

10 Dec '00

Brett Parker <b.parker(a)uea.ac.uk> writes: > Not sure how you'd do it in nux, have never (yet) needed to. In general, lilo -u, I think, but I suspect that won't work in this case. -- MJR

1 0

Re: [Alug] Options for mounting drives across ethernet
by MJ Ray 10 Dec '00

10 Dec '00

"Ashley T. Howes" <ashley(a)blueskyresearch.net> writes: > I was wondering about options to connect 2 Linux boxes together over > Ethernet, so I could mount the filesystem of one machine on another. I was > wondering what options are open to me to do this? I know of NFS. Are there > any systems which can cache the files pulled over the connection, so if the > same file is requested twice, it is only pulled over the network once? Do > the machines both need IP addresses to do this (either private or real), or > are there different way to address the boxes (using the ethernet mac address > for example)? I think most of the "next generation" of network file systems will do the sort of thing you describe, with various other performance caveats (eg it needs a sizeable cache). I'd suggest you start by looking at CODA, but when I last tried this around a year ago it wasn't yet usable. Any reason for not giving the machines IP addresses? It makes it a lot easier than using the ethernet cards raw. -- MJR

1 0

Re: [Alug] ["Jo Denton" <jdenton@sybex.co.uk>] Fw: Sybex books
by MJ Ray 10 Dec '00

10 Dec '00

Andrew Savory <A.Savory(a)uea.ac.uk> writes: > Indeed. Where was the delay, and how can we unblock it for the future? Between my ears. Send a shotgun to... -- MJR

3 2

3com ethernet cards
by Ashley T. Howes 10 Dec '00

10 Dec '00

Final question for today :) I am planning to purchase a 3com ethernet card for my Linux box (Athlon 650 - PCI card required). I know some of you have bought 3com cards in the past and was wondering what the best option was for Linux support. I have tended to use NE2000 compatible cards in the past, but recently heard that they put more load on the CPU than they are supposed to. So I thought a change to 3com would be best. Any pros or cons I should be aware of in using 3com ethernet cards with Linux? Thanks again for your help. Ashley Dr. Ashley T. Howes PhD Web Developer Email: ashley(a)blueskyresearch.net Web: http://www.ashleyhowes.com "When he sees the dream he seeks, he will sleep"

1 0

Re: [Alug] music department - linux - etc.
by MJ Ray 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

"d.casal" <d.casal(a)ntlworld.com> writes: > What I think I need, from reading the debian site: > A Devel_comp setup with X11 (planning for sound) and Server_std. Will > promise to do my homework on install docs and sound setup, but need pointers > + - miracles to start this well... Read the hardware HOWTO and www.alsa-project.org to find out if your sound card is well-supported. Depending on whether you're using the standard kernel drivers or ALSA, the setup will vary a bit. Unless something changed, the ALSA package in debian is a little out of date. Debian's own installation howto isn't bad, but remember there are lots of people around UEA to lend a hand if you hit problems. Back everything up first, though. -- MJR

1 0

music department - linux - etc.
by d.casal 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

Hey/ An e-mail exchange with andrew savory where I asked questions on linux/sound/cocoon+xml(xslt), went something like: (me)<< > -where do you think I should start as far as distributions? slackware seems > too hardcore, mandrake seems to give you 5000 apps I don't need...I'm > looking for a fast, stable, server system for sound and network tasks, > pretty much only...though X11 will be needed, since my unix skills aren't > that good at all. (a.savory)>> I'd go for Debian. It's a bit of a beast to install, but worth sticking with as maintenance is a dream. and... (me)<< > I really could use some advice on this, + any references to books, dists on > CD you may have lying around, etc. Hope I'm not being to cheeky there, but > Jonathan Impett (new guy at MUS) is plotting little nets of penguins talking > sound at each other, and it would be great to build a couple as test > boxes... (a.savory)>> Sounds cool - best bet is to email the alug list and ask someone to burn a CD for you. Brett is usually pretty happy to help in that respect. so anyway, I've read this list for a while (never active, anonymous coward like), earlier attempts with redhat 5.x etc thwarted by lack of unix know-how, though managed sound and a couple o' apps...back again to try (hopefully for good) and build a stable sound/networking box, then a first version of PC-104 or hacked laptop based wearable with a smaller, (maybe Work_std?) debian installation to run scaled down sound + net applications, which will form part of ARiADA (advanced research in aesthetics in the digital arts)... I really need all the help I can get, basically. What I think I need, from reading the debian site: A Devel_comp setup with X11 (planning for sound) and Server_std. Will promise to do my homework on install docs and sound setup, but need pointers + - miracles to start this well... people directly involved and/or about to be: j.impett(a)uea.ac.uk (music faculty) m.dixon(a)uea.ac.uk (researcher, ARiADA, SARA, music department) d.casal(a)uea.ac.uk (me, codemonkey helper for the above projects, XHTML, SMIL, etc) pseudoshark(a)netscapeonline.co.uk (edward.kelly(a)uea.ac.uk postgraduate researcher @ MUS) any help at all will be greatly appreciated. cheers, david casal

2 1

Re: [Alug] IRC meeting reminders
by MJ Ray 08 Dec '00

08 Dec '00

Paul Tansom <paul(a)whaletales.co.uk> writes: > I can't comment on VA as I don't work for or with them, Smoothwall is > an independant project. As for *new* LUGs, the Smoothwall project is > not involved with any attempt to setup new LUGs, it is a GPL dialup > router/firewall project. Again, a separate issue if anyone involved > with Smoothwall is involved with LUGs new or old. Personally I > consider myself involved with UK LUGs - again a separate issue to > Smoothwall, although had that is how I became aware of it at its > inception! Your project manager appears to have a real problem with keeping his various roles apart. The Smoothwall website mentions *both* VA and a project to start a new LUG. While it makes it clear Smoothwall is not a VA project, it does no such thing about SUK-LUG. It may surprise you that some southern English LUGs are taking this combined with Richard not answering requests for material as offensive. OK, it shouldn't surprise you, but it may ;-) -- MJR

1 0

[Denny <denny@concretecow.com>] UK LUGs useless?
by MJ Ray 06 Dec '00

06 Dec '00

What that LinuxUK/SmoothWall comment was about. Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 11:00:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Denny <denny(a)concretecow.com> To: MK LUG <mk(a)lists.lug.org.uk> If you read the recent announcement on www.linuxuk.co.uk about the release of SmoothWall, you will note that the author is less than impressed with the amount of help he has received from people in the UK LUGs. There are a few replies on there from people (myself included) who run LUGs, but I thought it might be good if a few LUG members wanted to comment also? Have a read and see what you think of his opinions... please try to respond intelligently, not in a confrontational manner. Regards, Denny # Denny De La Haye # Milton Keynes Linux User Group # denny(a)concretecow.com # info(a)mk.lug.org.uk # www.concretecow.com/denny # www.mk.lug.org.uk -- MJR

4 4

Linux Modems
by David Freeman 06 Dec '00

06 Dec '00

http://www.scan.co.uk/today.htm has this today Introducing the Smartlink PCI Modem from SCAN - 56K V.90 Its 101% Linux Compatible. A truly Hardware PCI Modem with the new Topic Chipset. As we all the usual DOS - Win'95-98-NT4 & Win-2000 usage, this is only one of very few that specifically caters for the LINUX operating systems. This is the modem the Linux community has been talking about and asking for! So... we made one! This is a True PCI hardware modem - no more CPU overhead - this modem has consistently given the best performance in testing. Usual features include Fax - Accelerated Video - Voice - & Data. All Voice / Fax / Data Software included. �29.00 Thanks D __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

main