Hi again
> because Java is lovely, well thought out language, I do admit that the
> implementation is a little dodgy ;)....
>
> > in that case I might as well use VB or even C# (yyyyyak!).
>
> now you are being silly ;)..
>
OK I am being silly, I mean VB .NET ;o)
> yep, I'll give you some of those, although I might argue that "Faster,
> More robust, reducing programmer effort" depends greatly on the
> programmer...
And since I am the programmer in question the point still stands!!
No seriously, actually writing effective generic templates often takes
longer than writing 400 very similar classes.
>c++ is actually very nasty in a OO sense.. it is C with
> object orientation and loads of other 'usefull' things bolted on.. pure
> C is nice, C++ is not imho ;)..
>
Modern C++ (as opposed to Classic/Common C++) is not C extended, it is not
a superset of C, it is a separate, albeit related language.
Give me well written modern C++ anytime.
(though I do love C, I take this view because I actually learned C++ b4 C
and found that way around that C seems very 'limited').
> > No runtime stuff required... compile and run...done. (ok so you have to
> > compile for each platform but at least you don't need a massive
> > installation of an SDK/JRE just to write your code and test it).
>
> yep, I agree with that....although there are some issues involved with
> porting code (32->64 bits, different memory architectures for example)..
> Java just works in these instances..
True.
> but how do you know you are in the real world right now ? you might be
> inhabiting a virtual mnachine in somebody's mind as we speak ;)..
I am actually inhabiting a solar system that is in fact a carbon compound
molecule in someone's kitchen table in a parallel and infinitely larger
(though relatively equal sized) universe.
> aahh step over to the greener side of the grass, I've been using
> Java/C++ for 7 years now, and for what I do (network programming/console
> based apps) Java is very cute. Once thing I will say here.. Java and GUI
> do not mix well.. I can't stand Java GUI's, they are a pig to get right,
> and each architecture handles them differently.. definatly C/C++ for
> gui's ;)..
Yep, geve up trying to get swing components to look good after a couple of
weeks and used C++ builder instead.
cheers
Earl