> MJ Ray wrote:
> > Would people consider these guidelines worth adopting for the ALUG lists?
> > If so, we'll add them to the web site.
>
> Do we really need "rules"?
No. That's why *I* wrote "guidelines" not "rules". Please do not change my
words. The idea is to add this somewhere because it costs us little effort
and avoids the long boring "please don't do that"/"but no-one said I
couldn't"/"but you shouldn't"/"OK, now I know, but why don't you tell
people?" arguments that periodically break out.
[...]
> not agree, I think Unix and Unix/Linux like alternative OS should be
> included, also this rule would mean GNU/Hurd would be rated off topic,
I think AIX, Solaris et al can go buy their own mailing lists, but general
GNU discussion would be allowed by that. And there's always social.
[...]
> *should be* yes, but if you can't do anything about it i.e. boilerplate
> from your employers then there is not to much we can do about it, just
> hope to embrace and educate.
I disagree on this. Many of those huge meaningless pseudo-legalese footers
really are horrendously long and the list has enough subscribers that it's a
lot of rubbish if it goes to everyone. If we can "encourage" people to get
their mail systems fixed, that's a good thing.
I know a lot of these are "obvious" to you or me, but having them posted
somewhere can't hurt, can it?
--
MJR